Is that the premium EB? The base GT is in the $36k range.The MSRP for the Type R and Ecoboost are 37k+/-500
Honestly, if I was doing serious track driving and I had to pick a GT for 37k or a Ecoboost base then throw the difference into suspension and go fast bits to compete against the typR I'd probably choose the ecoboost. The front end is significantly lighter and has z better weight distribution. After a cheap down pipe and intake with a custom tune they aren't too far off from the stock gen1 5.0 GT's while offering add in suspension and chassis mods and I can confidently say it would probably be faster then a stock gen1 or gen2 5.0 GT.The Mustang is meant to be a v8 car. The chassis and bodywork are meant to support a v8.
the Honda is meant to only support a 4 banger.
so an EcoBoost Mustang, great though it is, is at an automatic weight handicap due to it sharing a platform with v8 versions.
price being equivalent, the type R should really compete with the GT at a minimum.
the R is in a different price class because itâs a 4 banger. But that shouldnât mean itâs not the max potential of the civic platform.
itâs in a different performance class because itâs a 4 banger. That doesnât mean itâs not the best civic you can but.
the bottom end Mustang against the top end civic isnât a fair comparison regardless of price.
the R is to the civic what the 500 is to the Mustang.
Compare apples to apples? Let them fight.
do t want to do that, Iâm sure the 350 wonât mind standing in.
still too brutal? A GT PP would be the minimum.
price is equivalent and now itâs the top dog civic against the second from worst Mustang.
not fair to the Mustang, but the results wonât say that.
For autox in a parking lot the EB might be the better choice, but on a road course of any size the GT is the way to go. Even just a base GT with no mods will work great on a road course.Honestly, if I was doing serious track driving and I had to pick a GT for 37k or a Ecoboost base then throw the difference into suspension and go fast bits to compete against the typR I'd probably choose the ecoboost. The front end is significantly lighter and has z better weight distribution. After a cheap down pipe and intake with a custom tune they aren't too far off from the stock gen1 5.0 GT's while offering add in suspension and chassis mods and I can confidently say it would probably be faster then a stock gen1 or gen2 5.0 GT.
The issue with turbocharged engines at autocross is keeping them in boost through the slow turns. The strategy the Chevy engineers used in the turbo-4 Camaro at the Solo Nationals ended up being extremely abusive on the turbocharger.