SolarFlare
Well-Known Member
Probably easier to just ask the dyno operator to put the temp stack for the dyno into a mount of hot coal.
Sponsored
Give it a try and let us know. I genuinely hope it’s possible. Many shops made over 850whp on 93 too but that doesn’t translate to normal users. It’s more of a look at what we can doThe problem with your statement is that hellion has already surpassed 800 and 900whp with 93 oct.
If they hadn't then I would agree with you.
On a dyno.The problem with your statement is that hellion has already surpassed 800 and 900whp with 93 oct.
If they hadn't then I would agree with you.
Lol... let me know how your quest goes, sharpie. Ill be watching.What I thought.
Hahahahahaha!The problem with your statement is that hellion has already surpassed 800 and 900whp with 93 oct.
If they hadn't then I would agree with you.
While you are shooting for 800whp (not 1,000), Hellion did not do it on a stock motor (from their 1,003 rwhp on pump thread):The problem with your statement is that hellion has already surpassed 800 and 900whp with 93 oct.
If they hadn't then I would agree with you.
Was that Boostane “Professional ?” It takes a little less than 1 full bottle to treat 16 gallons of 93 to 102.What gen motor? I made 825 with the Hellion sleeper on a gen 3 using 93+boostane. Was 2 full cans to the tank so a little over 102 octane. I have the stock pump with JMS bap and DW95 injectors. About 12.8psi I’ve turned it up to 13.5 on 3 cans on the street but never dynoed.
I only run professional. Buy it in the 5 gallon pails. I fill the smaller cans from that. I usually run a full can per tank but for the dyno I dumped a second can in. There are some serious diminishing returns on the actual octane number once you go past a full can. You will still see results though, I can see a degree or two more of timing for each can I put in after the first but the first can is where you see the best bang for the buck.Was that Boostane “Professional ?” It takes a little less than 1 full bottle to treat 16 gallons of 93 to 102.
I’ve got nothing against turbo(s). They can make huge power. However my street driven Whipple car will run 8.70 this year and that’s all I need, so I don’t care about parasitic losswith the Turbo an engine doesn't have to make as much crank hp to make 800 rwhp as a supercharger because there is no parasitic hp loss from turning the blower. i'd be interested to know just how much hp the whipple or edelbrock takes to make 800 rwhp. i'm guessing they rob at least 50 hp