bluestang50
Well-Known Member
Keep telling yourself that buddy. I don't see how a 3.5 to 60, 50/50 weight distribution and good handling CUV is an embarrassment. The only embarrassment is a 4 banger "mustang" for sorority girls. Only time will tell the actual specs and I am willing to put down good money you will be eating crow. Oh wait I already did with my deposit. Stick to the other thread among your kin.The term "butt hurt" followed by a series of emojies is the last refuge of people on the Internet who know that they're losing an argument. So lets review, is it a "Mustang" or is it just another $60,000 SUV embarrassing it's namesake?
I've already explained that I don't measure my entertainment by 0-60. If I wanted a faster 0-60 I'd have bought a GT A10. But the performance benchmark for electric toasters has become 0-60 so that's why we're comparing this thing that is so special that it deserves the Mustang name against a plain old SUV from Tesla.
At this point the Mach E looks set to be embarrassed on that front and the only ace it has up it's sleeve is that it still gets the full tax credit. Only time will tell whether Ford can sharpen their pencils and save some face or whether the price of the "Performance Edition" (Karen likes Buicks) will erase its tax cut advantage.
Sponsored