ChiTownStang26
Well-Known Member
Sponsored
Much like how the midrange gains on E85 are very significant, while the top end is just like 30-35whp. These high compression engines like higher octane, especially the 2018+. Going to E85 was a massive jump in performance. I can see how 93 would give you some midrange umph.@tokuzumi
Yes the real difference is low/midrange power. Top end is negligible, which is what people hang their hat on since that's were peak hp occurs and everyone likes to quote hp numbers
You misunderstand I didn't say there was a law. But there are plenty of cases where mass amounts of cars some as much as 10 years old have giant recalls because of failed parts. This cost a manufacturer million if not billions and they want to avoid it. You think any mass failing of engines down the road warranty or not and the manufacturer would not be responsible? And the warranty is 5/60k so... not sure what to tell you there. As for the rest of your reply. I can say the same exact thing back to you. Prove it outside of a forum said so? You say you are waiting for someone to prove you wrong? Why is the burden of proof on someone else. Can you prove you are right? That is the norm with some car forums prove me wrong yet they have no proof they are right. Its a two way street. Anyway lets end it here and not make this thread about our disagreement. let's just agree to disagree and move on. Best of luck in your endeavors.@Briebee72
15-17 have 3/36 warrantys and please state me the law that a car cant have a part fail after warranty. That would make all car companies go out of business.
Come on dont be disingenuous, you know you can pick up a base gt for around 35k. I bought my 16 Premium with 17k miles used for 26k.
You say they test things but how come more time that not all the 15-17 guys with dual climate control are finding there ac crapping out just before or after warranty is up. This whole form is filled with people having random parts fail. They dont check shit, they cant even get the body panels aligned correct on most. They tested the pinto right? Not to mention the billion threads about gen3 motors with jacked up cylinder walls.
You say you "know" like you've studied the internals of this engine or you've actually done some test to show your point is correct. Your "know" just like the people know your arguing with when they say they can feel a difference on premium. Feelings and presumptions that a multi billion dollar company doesnt cut corners is incorrect.
I'm waiting for someone to present some information with data to prove me wrong, and if they do I'd gladly reconsider my position. Your problem is you know everything and are incapable of letting new points of view in. I dont know much and that's why I come here to take in others points of view and review their findings. I dont go off of feelings...
It's not so much about the number of additives. The key is the PTB (or ppm) level of detergent in the fuel. Top tier has a much higher level than LAC. ExMo, BP, Shell, and other TT companies will have plenty of detergent. Shell does try to differentiate themselves with other additives (maybe friction modifiers).So I recently put in 87 octane from Safeway which I think from research is not a top tier gas. Car ran ok but seemed like it had a cold. I read about Shell and how they use more additives than any other company with a total of I think 6 or 7 compared to the average 3 to 4 detergents. So last night I filled up with their top Nitro V power 91 ( all we have around here). Car seemed to wake up a bit. It feels a tad more responsive and overall cleaner healthier sounding engine. I just wanted to see if there was a difference in my opinion. I will be using Shell from now on even if it is $4.30 a gallon.
Use "Plus" & Premium, not reg. GT's don't like 87 octane, they will except 89 octane. I sometimes use them together for 91 octane equivalence. In the winter I have used 89 plus gas with no issues.Car seems a bit more peppy to me with premium. Will probably only use it in the summer though. Haven't had it long enough to see how regular does in the winter.
I've done that same test with multiple tanks of 87 and 91 in my 2015 GT that I daily drove. I never noticed a seat of the pants difference.So I recently put in 87 octane from Safeway which I think from research is not a top tier gas. Car ran ok but seemed like it had a cold. I read about Shell and how they use more additives than any other company with a total of I think 6 or 7 compared to the average 3 to 4 detergents. So last night I filled up with their top Nitro V power 91 ( all we have around here). Car seemed to wake up a bit. It feels a tad more responsive and overall cleaner healthier sounding engine. I just wanted to see if there was a difference in my opinion. I will be using Shell from now on even if it is $4.30 a gallon.
I can definitely tell a difference on my 2015. On 87 it runs fine, just not as responsive as it feels on 93. Midrange torque and on top end is where I really notice the difference. One of my jobs when I was in law enforcement was receiving the new patrol units for our department. We were small, about 100 deputies. The one thing I learned was we could get 10 new units in and there was always one that just ran better than the rest even though all were “identical”. I usually grabbed that one for my use.... rank had it’s privileges. We will likely trade/sell the Mustang in about a year and go back to a truck, but until then it will stay on 93.I've done that same test with multiple tanks of 87 and 91 in my 2015 GT that I daily drove. I never noticed a seat of the pants difference.