mmakam2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2015
- Threads
- 16
- Messages
- 309
- Reaction score
- 56
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Vehicle(s)
- 2019 GT350
- Thread starter
- #346
FYI guys, I am returning my system. I have opted to buy a bluetooth analyzer locally for $100, and a $50 content sensor so I can still have visibility into ethanol content and temperature (yes these sensors also output fuel temp).
I have a Lund FLEX tune now, and it works incredibly well. Learned alcohol % is dead on and matches with the bluetooth sensor, all the stuff around ford's flex logic not being accurate may be due to people who have cars that may have vacuum leaks or something, because it is literally dead on accurate. I have compared SCT alcohol percentage PID in LiveLink to the bluetooth sensor at various content levels and its never been off, not even by 1%. I also get the added benefit of optimized timing from the Lund tune.
Not to say AFD's system doesn't have value. Still great for folks who want zero footprint on their cars PCM, and don't want to risk their warranties. I'm sure if I had opted for the fixed harness it would have worked fine, but honestly tired of waiting, the whole experience left a bad taste in my mouth, and now that I have seen Ford's flex logic in action, I have no reason to continue the ProFlex journey.
Thanks to all for your feedback, sometimes this is how it goes when modifying cars, its a bit of uncharted territory, and I'll be the first to admit when I'm wrong. I kind of bought into the hype around Ford's FLEX logic not being accurate, but it simply is not the case.
I have a Lund FLEX tune now, and it works incredibly well. Learned alcohol % is dead on and matches with the bluetooth sensor, all the stuff around ford's flex logic not being accurate may be due to people who have cars that may have vacuum leaks or something, because it is literally dead on accurate. I have compared SCT alcohol percentage PID in LiveLink to the bluetooth sensor at various content levels and its never been off, not even by 1%. I also get the added benefit of optimized timing from the Lund tune.
Not to say AFD's system doesn't have value. Still great for folks who want zero footprint on their cars PCM, and don't want to risk their warranties. I'm sure if I had opted for the fixed harness it would have worked fine, but honestly tired of waiting, the whole experience left a bad taste in my mouth, and now that I have seen Ford's flex logic in action, I have no reason to continue the ProFlex journey.
Thanks to all for your feedback, sometimes this is how it goes when modifying cars, its a bit of uncharted territory, and I'll be the first to admit when I'm wrong. I kind of bought into the hype around Ford's FLEX logic not being accurate, but it simply is not the case.
Sponsored