Sponsored

2018 up GT on E85 come on in...

BWG

Active Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2018
Threads
3
Messages
28
Reaction score
11
Location
Laurelville, OH
First Name
Greg
Vehicle(s)
2018 Ford Mustang GT, 2011 Nissan Versa SL, 1989 Pontiac Firebird Formula 5.7
Vehicle Showcase
1
I made the switch to e85 last night. I have to do some rpm holds after work today for Palm Beach Dyno. I just have a Roush CAI, 3.55 and a10. The difference is sick to say the least over the 93 octane. My local e85 tested at 78% ethanol. They're likely tweaking my tune for that today so I can flash it again tonight for logging. Nice thread!
Sponsored

 

michail71

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2018
Threads
92
Messages
1,230
Reaction score
212
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT 401a A10
I just got a tank of 85% (as seen by the computer) from RaceTrack and loaded an E85R tune. First impressions are the idle can be rougher and bounce around some for a minute after startup. Otherwise it just feels stupid powerful, like the car gets launched by a catapult.

I may stick with the Flex file for normal day to day driving.
 

RBELUN

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2018
Threads
1
Messages
73
Reaction score
68
Location
TEXAS
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT P1
Vehicle Showcase
1
Impressive. I hope to see more of these ~500whp dynos for the basic bolton cars. Is the dyno tune still through Palm Beach Dyno?
Yes the dyno was used as PBD was able to edit and update data logs after runs were made.
 

BWG

Active Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2018
Threads
3
Messages
28
Reaction score
11
Location
Laurelville, OH
First Name
Greg
Vehicle(s)
2018 Ford Mustang GT, 2011 Nissan Versa SL, 1989 Pontiac Firebird Formula 5.7
Vehicle Showcase
1
I noticed the rpm swings on cold start too, but then the tuner cleaned up the fuel trim, and they mostly went away. They were only 125 rpm swings for me though. Overall, the e85 havs stupid power, but casual driving isn't quite as smooth for me yet as the 93 octane. It's still being worked on.

What I notice is a little more drag while moving with my foot off the gas and also with very minimal throttle maintaining low speeds. I'll have to see if I can get the tuner to give me more info on that. It might just be a characteristic of the fuel.

Not that I care, but 15 mpg's for me so far on it in case anyone was curious.
 

Lo Pony

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2015
Threads
5
Messages
308
Reaction score
119
Location
W. VA.
First Name
Take me home
Vehicle(s)
86 GT, red; 88 LX 5.0, black; 95 GT black; 99 Cobra with mods (still own); ‘16 GT, PP, manual, Ruby, drivetrain vibration!; Traded for ‘19 GT, A10, velocity blue, love it.
This is perhaps the most awesome thing I have ever seen on this forum. The only way this could get any better is if you added price per level of mods so you can see bang for the buck factor. As is, this is extremely helpful information! Thank you for publishing this. :)
I agree. There’s no substitute for DATA that’s part of a well controlled experiment.
 

Sponsored

Lo Pony

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2015
Threads
5
Messages
308
Reaction score
119
Location
W. VA.
First Name
Take me home
Vehicle(s)
86 GT, red; 88 LX 5.0, black; 95 GT black; 99 Cobra with mods (still own); ‘16 GT, PP, manual, Ruby, drivetrain vibration!; Traded for ‘19 GT, A10, velocity blue, love it.
I have the E85 flex from Livernois and drive it every day 20 miles round trip to work. Love it. Last I tested was E78 from a Chevron off Fletcher and I-5 in Los Angeles that also sells 100 octane Sunoco. No real issues with starting, drivability, anything else. This particular tune also has some transmission tweaks that make the car extra fun! Mileage is about 13 miles per gallon, but remember this is Los Angeles! Other than MRR wheels and tires, car is totally stock.
 

Lo Pony

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2015
Threads
5
Messages
308
Reaction score
119
Location
W. VA.
First Name
Take me home
Vehicle(s)
86 GT, red; 88 LX 5.0, black; 95 GT black; 99 Cobra with mods (still own); ‘16 GT, PP, manual, Ruby, drivetrain vibration!; Traded for ‘19 GT, A10, velocity blue, love it.
One question I have is why aren’t these cars E85 flex capable from the factory?
 

Andy13186

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Threads
106
Messages
2,455
Reaction score
1,450
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT 10speed Aluminator Whippled
One question I have is why aren’t these cars E85 flex capable from the factory?
That is a good question because clearly our fuel systems are good enough. F150's with coyotes are flex fuel vehicles too. So IDK.
 

thehunterooo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2014
Threads
23
Messages
3,255
Reaction score
1,062
Location
FL
Vehicle(s)
2006 Corvette
One question I have is why aren’t these cars E85 flex capable from the factory?
Would cost Ford more. Tuning would probably be another issue I expect. And E85 is still pretty rare in a lot of areas :(

Do any higher performance cars have flex fuel capabilities from factory?
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2018
Threads
0
Messages
7
Reaction score
8
Location
Australia
First Name
Michael
Vehicle(s)
2017 EB Mustang
Chevy SS had a flex v8 LS motor at one stage. Came out in a lot of Australian Commodores too.
 

Sponsored

bootlegger

Enginerd
Joined
Jul 12, 2017
Threads
9
Messages
1,765
Reaction score
593
Location
Mount Pleasant, SC
First Name
James
Vehicle(s)
Ex 2008 Mustang GT Owner
One question I have is why aren’t these cars E85 flex capable from the factory?
I can tell you my thoughts from working at a fuel system supplier...
First of all, higher ethanol levels tend to cause polishing of the roller surfaces in the HP pump. This tends to be the biggest issue with E100, but is still present in E85. This could cause early failures if a person was to run max ethanol content for long periods of time. I am guessing this is more likely in areas that always have >80% EtOH.
Second, the corrosion inhibitors that are normally used in ethanol are known to cause IVD and DI deposits. Someone running E85 100% of the time, with no detergent additive, would be very prone to having performance issues from deposit buildup.
Third, and probably the most important reason, is the tuning/validation restraints. Testing and validation would have to be done on both gasoline and E85, which leads to a lot more development costs. There would have to be a lot of additional mapping, as they would have to compensate for 87, 89, 91, and 93 octane gas, as well as E5 to E85 blended fuels. Given that most people don't care to use anything higher than E10, it's cheapest and easiest to just state that max E15 is allowed.
 

Lo Pony

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2015
Threads
5
Messages
308
Reaction score
119
Location
W. VA.
First Name
Take me home
Vehicle(s)
86 GT, red; 88 LX 5.0, black; 95 GT black; 99 Cobra with mods (still own); ‘16 GT, PP, manual, Ruby, drivetrain vibration!; Traded for ‘19 GT, A10, velocity blue, love it.
I can tell you my thoughts from working at a fuel system supplier...
First of all, higher ethanol levels tend to cause polishing of the roller surfaces in the HP pump. This tends to be the biggest issue with E100, but is still present in E85. This could cause early failures if a person was to run max ethanol content for long periods of time. I am guessing this is more likely in areas that always have >80% EtOH.
Second, the corrosion inhibitors that are normally used in ethanol are known to cause IVD and DI deposits. Someone running E85 100% of the time, with no detergent additive, would be very prone to having performance issues from deposit buildup.
Third, and probably the most important reason, is the tuning/validation restraints. Testing and validation would have to be done on both gasoline and E85, which leads to a lot more development costs. There would have to be a lot of additional mapping, as they would have to compensate for 87, 89, 91, and 93 octane gas, as well as E5 to E85 blended fuels. Given that most people don't care to use anything higher than E10, it's cheapest and easiest to just state that max E15 is allowed.
Good points. I like your earlier suggestions in another thread about using a detergent occasionally if e85 is the only fuel. I’ll do that too.
 

Kermitz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Threads
32
Messages
771
Reaction score
808
Location
Vacaville CA
First Name
Seth
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang GT PP1 300A M6
Vehicle Showcase
1
I had a talk with Shaun from AED about using E85 full time.
He said it's fine for full time use, but he did suggest using 5 ML of Marvel Mystery Oil per gallon of E85. Adding this supposedly lubes the fuel injectors.
 
Last edited:

bootlegger

Enginerd
Joined
Jul 12, 2017
Threads
9
Messages
1,765
Reaction score
593
Location
Mount Pleasant, SC
First Name
James
Vehicle(s)
Ex 2008 Mustang GT Owner
I had a talked with Shaun from AED about using E85 full time.
He said it's fine for full time use, but he did suggest using 5 ML of Marvel Mystery Oil per gallon of E85. Adding this supposedly lubes the fuel injectors.
Does MMO state compatibility with E85? From a detergent standpoint, only 1-2 are soluble in E85 (the main one being PEA).
 
OP
OP
Zinc03svt

Zinc03svt

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2018
Threads
30
Messages
2,342
Reaction score
1,269
Location
usa
Vehicle(s)
stang
I use Lucas UCL or Ethanol safe occasionally.
Sponsored

 
 




Top