tyler2k
Well-Known Member
and yea the mustang wins sales for two reasons, it's easier to daily live with, and it sells way more to fleet. take only actual consumer numbers they are alot closer
Sponsored
LOL, my fiance went home to hawaii with her family for a few weeks and sent me a picture of the retal lot. mustangs for as far as you could see... mostly convertibles. that is a huge portion of the sales for sureand yea the mustang wins sales for two reasons, it's easier to daily live with, and it sells way more to fleet. take only actual consumer numbers they are alot closer
The whole reason why GM can build those camaros are because they share the same engine as the corvettes. It lowers the R&D and manufacturing costs. Ford doesn't have a corvette equivalent to transfer the same engine to a heavier platform. What Ford has is different mustang variants. Ford could have made the GT500 a low 3300 lbs car and then transfer the engine to a regular mustang gt but it would be really tough for a car with a back seat. Besides, then what are they going to do with the GT350?so then what your saying is, ford cant build a comparable mustang for the same price point that Chevy can build the Camaro, and let's be honest the gt500 is gonna come in way more then a zl1 probably closer to Corvette territory. bottom line ford gives you x for y cost and Chevy gives you z for the same y cost. and isn't the R supposed to be an all out track car, cause the zl1 isnt. plus I'm sure you can pull up 100s of cars with huge horsepower advantages that get beat around a track.
Randy ran the ZL1 on different days with nearly a 3 second delta. Consistency only gets you so far. You can correct somewhat for 1/4 mile times due to varying weather. You cannot do the same for varying track conditions/weather conditions on a road coarse.OK enough dragging Randy Pobst through the dirt... The guy is maybe not Fernando Alonso, Scott Dixon, Spencer Pumpelly, Mario Andretti or Ayrton Senna, but he’s a fantastic and very consistent driver. Very knowledgable technically, to which some better drivers are not, and as unbiased as you’ll find. He’s a good control as a driver in a test of a vehicles capability.
As another sample, go step out of the “VS” section and into the road race section. Check out the GTPP2 times at Lime Rock and Mid-Ohio. Do the same on the Camaro forums. I point out those two tracks because steveespo ran his GTPP2 at those tracks in stock form (plus a cage). The time discrepancy is about 1-second.
This is where I swap over to Mustang's side...no one ever said that wasnt true, but doesn't change the fact that ford cant give you what Chevy does for the same price. and of course there are mustang's as far as the eye could see, who wouldn't want a sports car to teararound Hawaii
You're talking about the test where the ran the M6 vs A10, compared to another Head2Head involving the ZL1, right? There is a story with that one, if so. Look into it.Randy ran the ZL1 on different days with nearly a 3 second delta. Consistency only gets you so far. You can correct somewhat for 1/4 mile times due to varying weather. You cannot do the same for varying track conditions/weather conditions on a road coarse.
All we know is the GTPP2 and SS1LE are close. Until there is an actual same day head to head, we don't know which one is positively faster.
This is his quote on instagram a little over a month ago.From the article in question...
"Although we did not have both cars at the same time to do it properly, they were, in fact, tested in the same locations and by the same drivers. "
Different days, bullshit comparison...sorry.
If/when they test them on the same days...then we can talk. Don't get me wrong, I fully expect the 1LE to come out on top, but we won't know until a real same track/same day/same driver comparison takes place.
Easily 75% of total mustang sales are rental fleet.LOL, my fiance went home to hawaii with her family for a few weeks and sent me a picture of the retal lot. mustangs for as far as you could see... mostly convertibles. that is a huge portion of the sales for sure
Randy ran 3 seconds faster in the ZL1 M6 vs M6 on different days due to different temperatures and track conditions. He explained why, and this is why tests done on different days when were trying to compare times within a second are useless.You're talking about the test where the ran the M6 vs A10, compared to another Head2Head involving the ZL1, right? There is a story with that one, if so. Look into it.
They didn't test the 1le and PP2 on the same day, case closed. I'm not sure why this is so difficult to understand. The comparison because of this is worthless for determining which one is actually faster. The only thing we can determine (which we already know) is that they are close.This is his quote on instagram a little over a month ago.
2,734 likes
jonnyliebermanThe Mustang GT Performance Pack 2 is getting ready to run around the track. Faster or slower than a Camaro SS 1LE, which ran a 1:37.77.
This time is different from there last test they did with the 1le which was 2 years ago, so it must of been very recent. But by going off Probst comments, the results seem realistic.
I'd say closer to 90%Easily 75% of total mustang sales are rental fleet.
Might want to look at the numbers again.and yea the mustang wins sales for two reasons, it's easier to daily live with, and it sells way more to fleet. take only actual consumer numbers they are alot closer
They didn't test the 1le and PP2 on the same day, case closed. I'm not sure why this is so difficult to understand. The comparison because of this is worthless for determining which one is actually faster. The only thing we can determine (which we already know) is that they are close.