Oh for sure, but it makes more sense to go after the GTR with a TT V6, but add a supercharger and hybrid motor to improve the low end power, and use GTR-style AWD transaxle. It's actually pretty much confirmed from "my sources" and what a guy said on the internet. :headbonk:Guys. It's a rotary, Ford realized that Mazda had their shit together in the late 80's and early 90's.
The point of a TT engine to improve on economy is that the displacement can be dropped down a lot while keeping the same power. Not even sure if turbo's are even efficient (more turbo lag and little economy gains) when they have to feed high displacement engines with air.Why in the world would they put a supercharged engine in there?
That's soooooo 2004. I'd see that as a huge let-down/cop-out.
Ford has thrown all their eggs in the EcoBoost basket, I just can't see anything else but a TT V8. It makes too much sense.
I also thisk that it will be 5.2L or more. It can't be less displacement than the GT350.
There are few sure things in this world, one is that Ford is done with supercharging, and the other is that a GT500 has to have a larger engine than a GT350.
And you kidz can put down the AWD pipe. It's not hitting anymore.
TT 5.2, 720 H.P.The only bulge I really noticed was the one in my pants...
Your reasoning was fine but I think you left out one of the most important considerations. At some point the mainstream Mustang GT will need to move to a turbo V6. Ever-higher fuel efficiency standards will demand it. Traditional Mustang buyers would not accept a V6-powered GT.So bottem line:
GT500 US market only = supercharging ?
GT500 US and global market = TT V8 ?
Time will tell
When they are using Whipple on the CJ, why would they use a less powerful roots on a halo car?Sources I trust say it is a Eaton blower larger than 2.3l and mounted on a larger V8.
Close.5.2 with Cross-Plane-Crank, Forged out the wazzu, direct injection and TT.
Close.