Holley Manifold Testing- TEASER SHOT

[RomanB]

It's a dam intake manifold, we are acting like Stang tv is like the CIA, dyno results aren't national security secrets.

Sponsored

 

[GTBOB]

Ummm....where is the vacuum ports?

 

[86merc]

On the underside of the intake towards the back. You can see bungs welded in when you look at the inside picture.

 

[Voodooo]

It's a dam intake manifold, we are acting like Stang tv is like the CIA, dyno results aren't national security secrets.

Haaaaa haaaaaaaaa this is killing me.

 

[RomanB]

Vaccum ports per holley

 

[UPRSteve]

This is not an accurate spec sheet from Holley. I have been telling them for days to change this.

 

[RomanB]

This is not an accurate spec sheet from Holley. I have been telling them for days to change this.

I was thinking that 6800rpm power band seemed a little soft...

 

[RubyRedBoost]

Theoretically it is correct and does not need to be changed. As this IM resembles a lot of their products which peak in the same rpm range. Until they produce tangible evidence to prove otherwise. Anything else is just a sales pitch.

 

[mustang_guy]

Theoretically it is correct and does not need to be changed. As this IM resembles a lot of their products which peak in the same rpm range. Until they produce tangible evidence to prove otherwise. Anything else is just a sales pitch.

Seems you missed the post with picture saying its a Cj for cheaper with someone else thats testing it. Steve has basically hinted the exact same thing.

 

[RubyRedBoost]

Seems you missed the post with picture saying its a Cj for cheaper with someone else thats testing it. Steve has basically hinted the exact same thing.

Which is what at this point? Speculation... Which is why I said tangible evidence. Read

 

[Jbenso127]

Which is what at this point? Speculation... Which is why I said tangible evidence. Read

How is it speculation, if the person who posted it on Facebook, physically tested it? That's tangible. Not speculation.

 

[mustang_guy]

Which is what at this point? Speculation... Which is why I said tangible evidence. Read

How is it speculation? I read fine. Steve has hinted its a CJ for cheaper. He has numbers and facts. Hes unable to share. That doesnt make it speculation. This guy mentioned the tiny hp difference between holleys and fords CJ. Thats not speculation either.

 

[mustang_guy]

How is it speculation, if the person who posted it on Facebook, physically tested it? That's tangible. Not speculation.

You beat me. Guess thats what i get for starting the post but getting interrupted

 

[UPRSteve]

Theoretically it is correct and does not need to be changed. As this IM resembles a lot of their products which peak in the same rpm range. Until they produce tangible evidence to prove otherwise. Anything else is just a sales pitch.

I have facts its not accurate on many levels. The main one being it was ACTUAL tested was on a 2015 that I daily drive. If you think I'm' trying to sell this manifold then you again are mistaken, you can buy whatever you want. Will I offer this one... yes, but I can also offer the BOSS, CJ, GT350, ect. I can also tell you to spend money on other parts based on what your doing to the car instead of a manifold.

The results that I will personally post AFTER the STANG TV article is released will show more then anyone else will or could imagine.

I have hinted many factors throughout this thread with what i can.

 

[RubyRedBoost]

You beat me. Guess thats what i get for starting the post but getting interrupted

Post the corresponding dyno graphs.

Sponsored