If you have all those things with a tune you have a totally different beast. But then again you're not running 87. And probably not worried about fuel economy...
Ford recommends 87 octane, why should we have been expecting to be required to pay for 93?
No one is requiring you to pay for 93. However, your horsepower and torque figures are made with 93 octane.
Lol? Have to love people who talk out of their butt. What are you going to say next? Your 1989 handles better too? Keep the jokes coming man. I had a good chuckle. :lol:
My 89 notch ran 13.9 @ 98mph with a catback exhaust. It doesn't take much when the car weighs 3000 lbs flat. It's ok, I understand some people just don't know any better...it's not your fault.
LOL, I don’t need your trust and I didn’t backtrack. If I wanted to lie, I would have omitted the catback and 17 inch wheels. Quite frankly, the 17 inch wheels did nothing for traction and likely slowed me down.Which one is it? First, you said the car was stock. Then you said an exhaust. Then you said it had different wheels. Frankly, you've lost all my trust after backtracking 3 times. "REAL" stock for stock, the 89 notch was slower from 0-60, slower in the quarter, and was ugly as sin.
