BLU2DSKY
Well-Known Member
So I went to the SVT dealer, they said go back to my dealer and let them deal with it since it was already documented there (I assume because they get paid less for warranty work).
I went to my dealer and went straight to the service manager this time. We sat down and he said Ford has advised dealers NOT TO LOOK INTO THE RATTLE. Ford is very aware of the issues, they are also aware that its a huge topic on forums right now. Now he gave me an explanation on why he thinks the car rattles. I am not a gear-head and the explanation was over my head. But from what I gathered, it was something to do with the variable valve train. He stated there is a slight delay in response which is cause the rattle (or something along those lines). He also stated the delay had to do with the switch in systems (I assume injection). He said Ford is working on a TSB that should be out in the fall. He assumed it would be a simple programming fix. Now I don't know if that makes sense or not, but that's what he told me. He also confirmed THERE ARE ALOT of complaints about the same rattle in all coyotes including the F-150s.
In terms of the knocking noise, he stated thats the fuel being pumped in which causes the sound. I actually looked at the manual again to see what it stated about fuel. It actually states "Do not be concerned if the engine sometimes knocks lightly. However, if the engine knocks heavily while using fuel with the recommended octane rating, contact an authorized dealer to prevent any engine damage". So maybe this is not a huge issue, I do not hear it all the time and it's definitely a light knocking sound.
Side note, he said reasons like this are why cars will be going electric one day (I am scared of this as well, wanted my 5.0 before it was too late). He pleaded that I take care of this car cause V8s will be gone one day. He suggested I switch to full synthetic and go 92+ octane. Quick question, in Canada I have three primary choices. 93 and 94 with 10% ethanol or 91 with 0% ethanol. I originally started with the 93 but I just switched to the 91 to avoid the ethanol. I kept reading the ethanol causes corrosion long term but this goes against what he said in terms of octane (I forgot to ask about 91 specifically while I was there). Am I wrong, is the 93 and 94 better long term regardless of the ethanol content?
I went to my dealer and went straight to the service manager this time. We sat down and he said Ford has advised dealers NOT TO LOOK INTO THE RATTLE. Ford is very aware of the issues, they are also aware that its a huge topic on forums right now. Now he gave me an explanation on why he thinks the car rattles. I am not a gear-head and the explanation was over my head. But from what I gathered, it was something to do with the variable valve train. He stated there is a slight delay in response which is cause the rattle (or something along those lines). He also stated the delay had to do with the switch in systems (I assume injection). He said Ford is working on a TSB that should be out in the fall. He assumed it would be a simple programming fix. Now I don't know if that makes sense or not, but that's what he told me. He also confirmed THERE ARE ALOT of complaints about the same rattle in all coyotes including the F-150s.
In terms of the knocking noise, he stated thats the fuel being pumped in which causes the sound. I actually looked at the manual again to see what it stated about fuel. It actually states "Do not be concerned if the engine sometimes knocks lightly. However, if the engine knocks heavily while using fuel with the recommended octane rating, contact an authorized dealer to prevent any engine damage". So maybe this is not a huge issue, I do not hear it all the time and it's definitely a light knocking sound.
Side note, he said reasons like this are why cars will be going electric one day (I am scared of this as well, wanted my 5.0 before it was too late). He pleaded that I take care of this car cause V8s will be gone one day. He suggested I switch to full synthetic and go 92+ octane. Quick question, in Canada I have three primary choices. 93 and 94 with 10% ethanol or 91 with 0% ethanol. I originally started with the 93 but I just switched to the 91 to avoid the ethanol. I kept reading the ethanol causes corrosion long term but this goes against what he said in terms of octane (I forgot to ask about 91 specifically while I was there). Am I wrong, is the 93 and 94 better long term regardless of the ethanol content?
Sponsored