Sponsored

93 OCTANE TUNE ADDS 50WHP!

Livernois Motorsports

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Oct 25, 2014
Threads
226
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
950
Location
Dearborn Heights, Michigan
Website
www.livernoismotorsports.com
First Name
S550 HQ
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT (TVS 2650) (6R80)
Livernois has an amazing tune that will really wake up your mustang gt! Utilizing our 93 octane performance tuning, you can see power gains up to 50 wheel horsepower over stock, and 43 additional Ft. Lbs of torque! If this product is interesting to you and you would like some more information do not hesitate to give me a call at 313-561-5500 extension 104, my name is Cody and ill be glad to assist you!
Sponsored

 

ghostnote

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2016
Threads
41
Messages
233
Reaction score
59
Location
PR
Vehicle(s)
Mustang GT 2015
50whp doesn't sound right, unless it's in the mid-range. Two questions.

1) Is this 50 whp over stock tune using 93 as well?

2) Can you post a dyno sheet?
 
OP
OP
Livernois Motorsports

Livernois Motorsports

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Oct 25, 2014
Threads
226
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
950
Location
Dearborn Heights, Michigan
Website
www.livernoismotorsports.com
First Name
S550 HQ
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT (TVS 2650) (6R80)
50whp doesn't sound right, unless it's in the mid-range. Two questions.

1) Is this 50 whp over stock tune using 93 as well?

2) Can you post a dyno sheet?
Yes over stock using 93.
2017_Mustang_GT_stock_vs._93_performance_Watermarked.jpg
 

Sponsored

ypena02

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2015
Threads
27
Messages
787
Reaction score
200
Location
Massachusetts
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT
Any before/after 1/4 mile times?
 

EFI

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 19, 2015
Threads
62
Messages
4,792
Reaction score
4,050
Location
Masshole central
Vehicle(s)
5.Br0
356/344 at the wheels stock is a bit weak IMO.

It's easy to see huge gains when the baseline number is rather low. Not saying your product is bad (as it makes roughly the same power as any other tune out there) but seems a bit deceiving to advertise huge gains when clearly the baseline number is at best "fudged with".
 
OP
OP
Livernois Motorsports

Livernois Motorsports

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Oct 25, 2014
Threads
226
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
950
Location
Dearborn Heights, Michigan
Website
www.livernoismotorsports.com
First Name
S550 HQ
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT (TVS 2650) (6R80)
356/344 at the wheels stock is a bit weak IMO.

It's easy to see huge gains when the baseline number is rather low. Not saying your product is bad (as it makes roughly the same power as any other tune out there) but seems a bit deceiving to advertise huge gains when clearly the baseline number is at best "fudged with".
We use a harsher dyno than most companies do. our dyno numbers are more realistic than most!:cheers:
 

ypena02

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2015
Threads
27
Messages
787
Reaction score
200
Location
Massachusetts
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT
It all depends on track conditions and driver as well so times will vary from person to person
Stock vs Twin turbo 1/4 mile numbers will also vary from person to person, who cares? 1/4 mile numbers are more valuable than dyno numbers imo. Even if the driver sucks, you can still see the increase in trap speed. You can also account for differences in weather conditions.
 

Sponsored

BMR Tech

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Threads
168
Messages
5,141
Reaction score
3,691
Location
Tampa, FL
Website
www.bmrsuspension.com
First Name
Dion
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT, 2010 GT500, 2019 F-150 5.0
Stock vs Twin turbo 1/4 mile numbers will also vary from person to person, who cares? 1/4 mile numbers are more valuable than dyno numbers imo. Even if the driver sucks, you can still see the increase in trap speed. You can also account for differences in weather conditions.
This is a tough one.

I hopped in my best friends GT500 and went 144.4mph with it, after he went 137 about 6 times in a row.

As for the weather, I cannot imagine how the public would take that. "We trapped the same mph, but it was because the DA was 4000ft higher" - they would get laughed at.

Dyno results, in my years of experience, is my preferred and what I believe to be the best method.
 
OP
OP
Livernois Motorsports

Livernois Motorsports

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Oct 25, 2014
Threads
226
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
950
Location
Dearborn Heights, Michigan
Website
www.livernoismotorsports.com
First Name
S550 HQ
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT (TVS 2650) (6R80)
This is a tough one.

I hopped in my best friends GT500 and went 144.4mph with it, after he went 137 about 6 times in a row.

As for the weather, I cannot imagine how the public would take that. "We trapped the same mph, but it was because the DA was 4000ft higher" - they would get laughed at.

Dyno results, in my years of experience, is my preferred and what I believe to be the best method.
We totally agree with you! It all varies on driver skill and conditions
 

ypena02

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2015
Threads
27
Messages
787
Reaction score
200
Location
Massachusetts
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT
I wonder why nobody hardly ever recommends Livernois when the topic of "best GT tuner" comes up. It's always Lund, AED, PBD, etc. Maybe it's because those tuners have 1/4 mile numbers to back up their tunes.
 

ypena02

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2015
Threads
27
Messages
787
Reaction score
200
Location
Massachusetts
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT
This is a tough one.

I hopped in my best friends GT500 and went 144.4mph with it, after he went 137 about 6 times in a row.

As for the weather, I cannot imagine how the public would take that. "We trapped the same mph, but it was because the DA was 4000ft higher" - they would get laughed at.

Dyno results, in my years of experience, is my preferred and what I believe to be the best method.
So your friend is a fat ass? lol jk :cheers:
Sponsored

 
 




Top