Sponsored

Help with recent dyno

svtfever

ALEX
Joined
Feb 4, 2014
Threads
225
Messages
1,398
Reaction score
451
Location
TX
First Name
William
Vehicle(s)
2019 GTPP1
Headers, intake and tune are done but dyno was stupid low. It is a Lund tune and I am very disappointed. The last 3 pulls are from today w/ the mods.





[ame="[MEDIA=youtube]id=lZlahag6BZs;t=60[/MEDIA]"]
Sponsored

 

Jayme

DoggystyleRacing®
Joined
May 24, 2015
Threads
27
Messages
447
Reaction score
80
Location
Baytown, TX
Website
www.aedhp.com
First Name
Jayme
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT
what #'s were you looking for?
 

WhiteyDog

WOOF!!!
Joined
Jun 30, 2016
Threads
15
Messages
1,789
Reaction score
731
Location
Manheim, Pa.
Vehicle(s)
'16 GT PP
Those numbers don't look bad at all. If those are your only mods, you're in the neighborhood of where you should be.
 
OP
OP
svtfever

svtfever

ALEX
Joined
Feb 4, 2014
Threads
225
Messages
1,398
Reaction score
451
Location
TX
First Name
William
Vehicle(s)
2019 GTPP1
Really? I was hoping for about 10 more hp/tq.
 

Sponsored

youra6

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2018
Threads
6
Messages
161
Reaction score
30
Location
CO
Vehicle(s)
2005 Evo VIII RS, 2018 Mustang GT
Really? I was hoping for about 10 more hp/tq.
So many variables determines the outcome of a dyno run such as ambient temps, altitude, fuel, etc. This isn't an exact science and a difference of 10hp hardly means anything at all. You could do a dyno run tomorrow and get different numbers.
 

robw_39

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Threads
10
Messages
106
Reaction score
45
Location
Atlanta, GA
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT
So many variables determines the outcome of a dyno run such as ambient temps, altitude, fuel, etc. This isn't an exact science and a difference of 10hp hardly means anything at all. You could do a dyno run tomorrow and get different numbers.
True but that is what the correction is for it should keep things close so you can see what gains were actually made. Based on the mods and his baseline dyno it seems like his result are good but could be better or should be better. Baseline 430 and after headers CAI and Tune only picking up 29 peak seems low to me.
 

Fredboy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2016
Threads
4
Messages
96
Reaction score
51
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2004 Camaro Super Sport
True but that is what the correction is for it should keep things close so you can see what gains were actually made. Based on the mods and his baseline dyno it seems like his result are good but could be better or should be better. Baseline 430 and after headers CAI and Tune only picking up 29 peak seems low to me.
Those gains look on par for 93 octane. 2018s are tuned more aggressively from the factory, so you typically wont see very high gains on 93.
 

bootlegger

Enginerd
Joined
Jul 12, 2017
Threads
9
Messages
1,765
Reaction score
593
Location
Mount Pleasant, SC
First Name
James
Vehicle(s)
Ex 2008 Mustang GT Owner
Didn't someone post up about getting about 30whp from intake and tune alone in a 2018?
 

Sponsored

robw_39

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Threads
10
Messages
106
Reaction score
45
Location
Atlanta, GA
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT
thats what I thought too
Did you data log the dyno runs? If so I would have Lund look at them and see if there is anything going on with the knock sensors and see what kind of timing the car is running...

Some say it is right on par I still think it is off some... and it never hurts to have the tuner look things over and see if you need some tweaks or changes.
 

JeromeS550

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2017
Threads
8
Messages
84
Reaction score
31
Location
CA
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT, Premium, Performance, Kona, A10
Those numbers (460/414) look decent for headers, CAI, and 93 octane tune. What mods are in the red dyno curve?

Jerome
 
 




Top