Sponsored
What Dyno Tested "NA" Mods actually increase HP Above 500wp on 93 pump?
Templarum
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2020
- Threads
- 13
- Messages
- 73
- Reaction score
- 51
- Location
- Wilmington NC
- First Name
- David
- Vehicle(s)
- 2017 Ruby Red GT
All of the above plus E85 on a gen three will get you close. Maybe some cams to get you over the top but streetability will suffer.
Definitely not a lot of value cost wise with that kind of setup, ask me how I know. FI has the best cost ratio for power upgrade.
Angrey
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2020
- Threads
- 95
- Messages
- 2,392
- Reaction score
- 2,443
- Location
- Coral Gables
- Vehicle(s)
- 2016 GT350
On 93, it's going to be obviously much tougher (and much less safe).
You can get there, but it will probably involve LTH (catess), High Flow intake tube and CJ, upgraded valve train (to rev to 8500+), tune (obviously) and maybe even cams.
You'll need an intake that can keep singing all the way through the way up top, which will compliment cams and an increase in redline.
Of course on E85 or even E30 it would be easier and safer.
You can get there, but it will probably involve LTH (catess), High Flow intake tube and CJ, upgraded valve train (to rev to 8500+), tune (obviously) and maybe even cams.
You'll need an intake that can keep singing all the way through the way up top, which will compliment cams and an increase in redline.
Of course on E85 or even E30 it would be easier and safer.
LSchicago
Well-Known Member
To me 500-600RW is not a limit, it's a starting point. Boost was an easy decision forme. Boost & fuel for an easy 900RW.
Sponsored
shogun32
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2019
- Threads
- 89
- Messages
- 14,682
- Reaction score
- 12,214
- Location
- Northern VA
- First Name
- Matt
- Vehicle(s)
- '19 GT/PP, '23 GB Mach1, '12 Audi S5 (v8+6mt)
- Vehicle Showcase
- 2
you're kidding yourself for starters. You won't even make 500 crank HP with the kitchen sink thrown at it.
Storing a car with E85 in the winter is not a good idea. flush with 91+ and retune back to a standard fuel tune.
Storing a car with E85 in the winter is not a good idea. flush with 91+ and retune back to a standard fuel tune.
Angrey
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2020
- Threads
- 95
- Messages
- 2,392
- Reaction score
- 2,443
- Location
- Coral Gables
- Vehicle(s)
- 2016 GT350
Most modern car fuel systems are now E85 resistant. Some cars do end up having a shorter lifespan with 02 sensor than others, but it's a hit or miss issue and a handful of people.
Having said all that, if you're trying to push the output of the motor WAY beyond it's intended/designed parameters, you're MUCH MUCH safer doing it on a safer fuel.
No you can't store the car for weeks on end with E85 in the fuel tank. Who does that anyway? If you're going to do that there's steps you can take.
I personally would NOT be pursing very high output numbers on 93. There's just way too much variance from pump to pump (or even on the same pump after different resupplies) and it only takes one questionable batch of 93 to smoke the motor.
12:1 compression is NOT forgiving to bad fuel.
E85 also runs cooler, so you protect against issues like rings overheating and binding and destroying ring lands.
As always, it's your car, and a wild 93 build would be unique, but only because most people recognize that E85 isn't just better for producing more sauce, it's safer. You can actually test and verify the quality of the E85 at every fill up, so you know when you're getting poor quality E and not to dog the car until you fill it with proper fuel. You can't do that with 93.
You can run fuel additives to keep the octane rating higher, but that has drawbacks (and cost) as well.
I honestly think you'd be better off dropping $8k-$10k on a very basic power adder setup and keep it very low power. You'll spend nearly as much trying to squeeze out 500 rear on 93 and the only way you're going to get there is if you spend a bunch of money upgrading a whole bunch of parts and also push the limits of timing and redline. You'd honestly be safer and have more power if you just slapped an 8 lb single turbo kit on it.
TRP45ACP
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 25, 2020
- Threads
- 6
- Messages
- 157
- Reaction score
- 92
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Vehicle(s)
- 2018 GT Premium Coupe, PP1, MT82, 401A
FI is a much better option.
Sponsored
Templarum
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2020
- Threads
- 13
- Messages
- 73
- Reaction score
- 51
- Location
- Wilmington NC
- First Name
- David
- Vehicle(s)
- 2017 Ruby Red GT
I'm jealous of that torque. I don't understand where all that came from.
Jaymar
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2018
- Threads
- 2
- Messages
- 985
- Reaction score
- 1,144
- Location
- Portland, OR
- First Name
- Jaymar
- Vehicle(s)
- 2022 GT/CS - Rapid Red
There really doesn't seem to be a lot of information out there for NA Coyotes which leads me to believe that there isn't much there to be had. Especially for the amount of money that it ends up costing. The second most interesting thing, however; is in every one of these threads where somebody rules out E85 from the beginning somebody always has to say E85 anyway. It's baffling.
Sponsored