Elp_jc
Well-Known Member
As I said before on a similar thread, they're different cars. I DID NOT want a PP2 car, and the Mach1 is probably a PP2.5. If somebody feels like the screwed up with the Bullitt because they wanted a more radical car, then yes, the Mach1 would be a good option. I would not get one at any price, because it's not what I need. I had a 1970 Mach1 with the shaker hood while in college, and I MUCH prefer the Bullitt now. As Chuck said, maybe because we're older (58 here), but due to where I live, my previous sports cars just sat in the garage. I need a GT car that is a good compromise between sport and comfort, to be relatively comfortable to travel to enjoyable roads and places. And the Bullitt was as good a compromise as it gets. It needed a bit more control on the suspension, but the Steeda front 2-point and rear braces pretty much fixed that without affecting the ride (or having to re-align it), so it's just about perfect for my needs right now.
Finally, I actually like my D4 tranny better (feels more refined) than the Tremec TR6060 on my last Vette... which turned out defective. So glad to have the Getrag instead. The Tremec is probably more robust (at least the TR-6060; the 3160 is a weaker variant), but I'll never need that, so not an issue for me.
Finally, I actually like my D4 tranny better (feels more refined) than the Tremec TR6060 on my last Vette... which turned out defective. So glad to have the Getrag instead. The Tremec is probably more robust (at least the TR-6060; the 3160 is a weaker variant), but I'll never need that, so not an issue for me.
Sponsored