Sponsored

SCCA F-Street Setup. What's Everyone Done so Far?

NightmareMoon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2015
Threads
43
Messages
5,686
Reaction score
4,700
Location
Austin
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
For the guys running front bars, what stiffness setting are you liking? I've been using a rear bar but am going to try the switch.
Sponsored

 

jpaulson

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Threads
9
Messages
153
Reaction score
62
Location
Portland, OR
Vehicle(s)
2016 GTPP
For the guys running front bars, what stiffness setting are you liking? I've been using a rear bar but am going to try the switch.
I run a modified oem front bar. I drilled a hole 1 1/2inches forward of existing hole.

I did some rough measurements and I think it is pretty close to most aftermarkert bars on the softest setting.
 

NightmareMoon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2015
Threads
43
Messages
5,686
Reaction score
4,700
Location
Austin
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
For those running a 34/35mm front bar, what adjustment hole are you guys using?
 

Whiskey11

Kill ALL the Cones!
Joined
Oct 19, 2013
Threads
2
Messages
523
Reaction score
102
Location
US of A
Vehicle(s)
2016 Ruby Red Base GT/PP
For those running a 34/35mm front bar, what adjustment hole are you guys using?
Softest. It didn't need much more front bar IMO, just enough to settle the rear of the car a little bit. I run the BMR front bar there and have ran it in all three places and the other two just made the car a smidge too pushy in steadstate for my codriver and I's driving style.
 

Brazos609

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Threads
23
Messages
717
Reaction score
268
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT Premium PP Recaro
What about running a 265/40R19 RE-71R front and rear on PP spec 9" front and 9.5" rear rims?
 

Sponsored

Brazos609

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Threads
23
Messages
717
Reaction score
268
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT Premium PP Recaro
You can do it, but why ? Fir tiny gain on the max speed in 2nd gear ?
For me the speedometer should be dead on with the 265/40R19, with the stock 275/40R19 it actually reads slow. I thought the would work well on both the 9" front and 9.5" rear. The 265/40R19 is 2lbs lighter and $48 cheaper than the 275/35R19. Wouldn't the 275/35R19 only be a tiny gain in traction over the 265/40R19 given the same tire and tread compound?
 
Last edited:

jpaulson

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Threads
9
Messages
153
Reaction score
62
Location
Portland, OR
Vehicle(s)
2016 GTPP
For me the speedometer should be dead on with the 265/40R19, with the stock 275/40R19 it actually reads fast. I thought the would work well on both the 9" front and 9.5" rear. The 265/40R19 is 2lbs lighter and $48 cheaper than the 275/35R19. Wouldn't the 275/35R19 only be a tiny gain in traction over the 265/40R19 given the same tire and tread compound?
IIRC, tire rack measured the tread width to be substantially narrower. Almost an inch I think it was.
 

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
9,011
Reaction score
4,721
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
For me the speedometer should be dead on with the 265/40R19, with the stock 275/40R19 it actually reads fast.
Why would speedometer accuracy matter at autocross?

If a 275/40-19 causes the speedometer to "read fast" - displaying more mph than actual, going to a 265/40-19 would only exaggerate the inaccuracy.


Norm
 

Brazos609

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Threads
23
Messages
717
Reaction score
268
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT Premium PP Recaro
I should have said slow, GPS and radar put me at 77 at an indicated 75. The real question was one tire to fit well on the 9"/9.5" combo and not go to a smaller overall diameter if possible.
 

Sponsored

johnson.ba

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Threads
3
Messages
117
Reaction score
34
Location
Southern Arizona
First Name
Brent
Vehicle(s)
2016 Shelby GT350 Track Pack
I should have said slow, GPS and radar put me at 77 at an indicated 75. The real question was one tire to fit well on the 9"/9.5" combo and not go to a smaller overall diameter if possible.
I run 275s on all 4. I should be running a 5mm spacer up front but I haven't been to the auto parts store to get one.
 

DickR

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2014
Threads
3
Messages
1,400
Reaction score
508
Location
Raleigh
Vehicle(s)
2018 Ruby Red GTPP MagneRide 301A 10A and 1997 GT
Why would speedometer accuracy matter at autocross?

If a 275/40-19 causes the speedometer to "read fast" - displaying more mph than actual, going to a 265/40-19 would only exaggerate the inaccuracy.


Norm
It doesn't at the autocross but most of us these days drive to/from the event, sometimes hundreds of miles each way, and around town in the autocross season on our autocross RE-71R's. :D

FYI on a heavy car like the Mustang the wider 35 series tires are better than the narrower 40 series tires. More rubber on the road for corners and better response.
 

qtrracer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2016
Threads
1
Messages
300
Reaction score
91
Location
California
First Name
Greg
Vehicle(s)
16 GT Premium PP Recaros; 86 GT 'Vert Pro-touring
There are trade-offs everywhere. Run the 40 and get a little more MPH. Run the 35 and get a little more grip. And it's all theoretical anyway. I run the 40s - 265/285 MPSS.
 

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
9,011
Reaction score
4,721
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
It doesn't at the autocross but most of us these days drive to/from the event, sometimes hundreds of miles each way, and around town in the autocross season on our autocross RE-71R's. :D
Actually, I'm in much the same situation when I've got multiple events within a small time frame with 285/35-18 (25.9" tall) "track tires" vs ~27" tall OE's. These days, even my "strictly street use set" tires are only 26.3" tall (265/40-18's). For only a couple mph @ highway speeds I don't ever worry about whether the speedometer/odometer is off, which way it might be off, or by exactly how much. Probably won't ever go back to a 27" tall size. A couple mph of speedometer error isn't something I'd ever worry about.

Norm
 
Last edited:

NightmareMoon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2015
Threads
43
Messages
5,686
Reaction score
4,700
Location
Austin
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
Tire rack specs for the RE71R

265/40R19 27.4” diameter, tread width 9.3, section width 10.7 on a 9.5” wheel
275/35R19 26.6” dia, tread 10.0, section 10.9 on a 9.5” wheel
285/35R19 26.8” dia, tread 10.1 section 11.4 on a 10” wheel

Keep in mind the section width is highly dependent on the wheel width, which explains the entirety of the difference between the tested section widths between the 275 and 285 tires.

According to those stats, the 265 is ~0.8” (-8%) narrower tread than the 285 for only 2.2% more diameter. I’m keeping the 285s :)
Sponsored

 
 




Top