Burkey
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1,726
I understand what you’re saying but it makes little difference to the health of the planet if you draw an arbitrary line and decided that all people on this side of it are entitled to X while all those on the other side of it are entitled to less of X.Hello; I have been questioned as to why a per capita view of pollution is less valid than a country view. The general answer is that individual citizens do not make policy or laws or executitive (sp) orders. These more broad policies of an entire country shape what individuals can and cannot do.
If we can agree in principle that each INDIVIDUAL should be allowed a certain amount of X, then we can talk about what that looks like on a “per nation” basis, depending on the population of that nation.
I’m ignoring certain nuances here because it’s obviously more complex than that due to the distribution of minerals and other materials, that we ALL rely on, and the mining/manufacturing processes that are required to produce them.
That’s a separate debate, and one worth having, but if you can’t agree on the initial premise, there’s no point in moving forward.
Sponsored