Joemomma22
Well-Known Member
I cant even opinion
I hate it so much... on some angles
I love it on several others.
GODDDDDDDDDDDD
I hate it so much... on some angles
I love it on several others.
GODDDDDDDDDDDD
Sponsored
The shape of this car reminds me of a 1970 mach 1 it's a good looking car idk what all of the bitching about crying aboutNice pictures, I think it looks really good out in the wild
If I can't delete that spoiler with the PP option on a 'vert, not getting the PP will be a huge disappointment.I'm with you on this one. Spoiler delete option for me!
The shape of this car reminds me of a 1970 mach 1 it's a good looking car idk what all of the bitching about crying about
LMMFAO
Opinions. Just like you have yours.The shape of this car reminds me of a 1970 mach 1 it's a good looking car idk what all of the bitching about crying about
Euro NCAP have tested 11 cars under the new 2017 rules. The '17 Mustang has the lowest score in most areas and the only one with just two stars. The '18 must address this with better airbag deployment, rear seat belt pre-tensioners and the normal safety electronics included as standard. We don't know yet if Ford have implemented these simple features. If not I'm getting my deposit back.
Simply adding the collision avoidance as a standard option is going to bump the rating to a 3-4 start vehicle. IMHO, this should be separated out. Would you rather be in a vehicle that has a 30% crash rating yet has 70% collision avoidance, or one that a 70% crash rating and 0% collision avoidance. When you group all of these together, it gives you a false idea of just how safe the vehicles are.Euro NCAP have tested 11 cars under the new 2017 rules. The '17 Mustang has the lowest score in most areas and the only one with just two stars. The '18 must address this with better airbag deployment, rear seat belt pre-tensioners and the normal safety electronics included as standard. We don't know yet if Ford have implemented these simple features. If not I'm getting my deposit back.
You'd really let that keep you from getting a fun car? I would assume you like motorcycles looking at your avatar. How safe are they compared to a modern Mustang? I have a '67 GTO. I hate to think about my face hitting that steering wheel and there are no air bags or even a shoulder belt to keep that from happening. Damn sure not going to let that stop me from enjoying it though.Euro NCAP have tested 11 cars under the new 2017 rules. The '17 Mustang has the lowest score in most areas and the only one with just two stars. The '18 must address this with better airbag deployment, rear seat belt pre-tensioners and the normal safety electronics included as standard. We don't know yet if Ford have implemented these simple features. If not I'm getting my deposit back.
So are you really going to feel safer when Ford simply throws in the collision avoidance as a standard option and the ratings magically jump up to a 3/4 star?2017 NCAP results here...
http://www.euroncap.com/en/ratings-...s=false&selectedDriverAssistanceTechnologies=
Real problems, not just a cup of tea spilled. Ford apologised and said the '18 would be a lot better, we will see.
I just bought my car which was after those ratings came out. I care less what they say, the lack of stars doesn't bother me. Not raising my hackles, I am happy with my car. I just can't imagine not getting a car I am looking forward to due to something so trivial. I understand to you it may not be so trivial, to me it is. You speak of waiting but from what I read, you may be waiting for nothing if the stars don't come up. I say if you want it get it stars be damned! :cheers:Of course I couldn't care less about the two stars. But see how easy it is to raise the hackles of owners of the two star car. I intend keeping my car for 6 years. Six years of pub talk needling "Two stars, blah, blah, blah" I just don't need it.
And by waiting I get a better looking car!