Sasuketr
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2014
- Threads
- 61
- Messages
- 2,549
- Reaction score
- 353
- Location
- Chicago,IL
- Vehicle(s)
- 2015 Ingot Silver GTPP
- Thread starter
- #1
Hi guys,
I would like to share my comparison for the two systems i listed in the topic. First of all the car is Lund Flex Fuel tuned and running on 93 octane. I ve used the mishimoto setup and switched to airaid no tune intake about 4 months ago. I ve used both oiled and dry versions of the cone filter. After asking Lund an advice if the intake required a tune adjustment, i ve received a definite NO as their answer. I sent them multiple logs to confirm this.
Lets get back on the comparison. With the same fuels, the intake lost significant low end torque around 2500 to 4000 rpm range. On the upper rpm region above 6000 rpm, the car started pulling a degree or degree and half spark timing. According to Lund this was normal.
I put the mishimoto induction hose and k&n intake setup back in the car a week ago, just to feel and see the difference. This setup added the lost low end torque. On second gear even the weather is above 80 degrees, the traction light comes on around 4000 rpm on second gear with sport mode. With the airaid, this never happened. The computer also adds timing upto 30 degrees with no timing being pulled on the same gas. Car feels more powerful.
Now, i m kinda confused with the results. Either the car really needs tune adjustment even with a no tune intake ( Lund said otherwise), or somehow this mishimoto induction hose and k&n filter combo is something not ordinary! Go figure!
I would like to share my comparison for the two systems i listed in the topic. First of all the car is Lund Flex Fuel tuned and running on 93 octane. I ve used the mishimoto setup and switched to airaid no tune intake about 4 months ago. I ve used both oiled and dry versions of the cone filter. After asking Lund an advice if the intake required a tune adjustment, i ve received a definite NO as their answer. I sent them multiple logs to confirm this.
Lets get back on the comparison. With the same fuels, the intake lost significant low end torque around 2500 to 4000 rpm range. On the upper rpm region above 6000 rpm, the car started pulling a degree or degree and half spark timing. According to Lund this was normal.
I put the mishimoto induction hose and k&n intake setup back in the car a week ago, just to feel and see the difference. This setup added the lost low end torque. On second gear even the weather is above 80 degrees, the traction light comes on around 4000 rpm on second gear with sport mode. With the airaid, this never happened. The computer also adds timing upto 30 degrees with no timing being pulled on the same gas. Car feels more powerful.
Now, i m kinda confused with the results. Either the car really needs tune adjustment even with a no tune intake ( Lund said otherwise), or somehow this mishimoto induction hose and k&n filter combo is something not ordinary! Go figure!
Sponsored
