68fbjjz109
Well-Known Member
This is the trend. And it has little to with the environment in some cases. EV have significantly less operational costs associated with them in general. While the entry cost may be higher, and that is expected to grow some; the vehicles over their life cycle have much less cost to the customer, due in large part to the reduction of consumables and wear items.I 100% disagree with both of those statements. They seem pretty foolish to me, actually.
I agree that it's likely that in the future some crooked politicians and greedy corporations probably will try to make me buy something I don't want. It's best for me to speak out publicly and fight tooth and nail against it. I will definitely vote against politicians that have taken bribes or for some other reason believe that electric vehicles are good for the environment or better in some way than vehicles with ICEs.
It definitely looks like a Mustang ripoff. I agree on not wanting a 3 cylinder turbo diesel engine as well.
Hybrids or Hybrid-light vehicles with BSG systems will keep the ICE and the industry around it alive for a much longer timeframe. What the EPA considers or could fall into the category of emissions defeat devices is growing. Most vehicles are not evaluated in their highest option set by volume, with all supplementary systems on such as AC, Radio, and driver assists features running place an additional load on your engine. Most of customers who we work in these areas had a slight sigh of relief with the current administration, however no one is changing their long term plan and they are quickly realizing this administration will likely not run full term.
Sponsored