jtmat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2015
- Threads
- 9
- Messages
- 1,998
- Reaction score
- 881
- Location
- DC/MD/VA metro
- Vehicle(s)
- Vert turbo!!!!
From what I read, this is a non-issue...
Sponsored
People actually tried this?geniuses that used a tune and Boostmax in tandem.
Yep, the guy in the thread below tried both of them just to test it but not for too long, but in the end Boostmax appears to be reason the engine failed.People actually tried this?
Saying that all Spanish engines are more prone to failure than all Cleveland engines is not an accurate statement. The engine failures were early 2014 builds (July-Sept?) and mostly all tuned so perhaps the tuners adjusted the tunes over time as well as manufacturing abnormalities regarding the rod bolt torque were corrected. There are many more tuned 2015 running just fine than blown engines and the frequency of engine failure has diminished over time. To my knowledge the 678, 677, 676. and 675 Spanish engines have held up better than the previous engine numbers and are the fastest EB's setting records at the track. Also, some tuners have never had a blown engine. There are too many variables that are unknown and may have changed at some point to say that Cleveland engines are superior to all Spanish engines.People are missing the point. Just because you have a Spanish built engine and have had no problems doesn't mean they aren't more prone to failure. I have one too and have had no problems. The point is there is data already that shows that most of the engine problems have been from the Spanish built motors, extremely few once they moved to Cleveland and I would argue all or most of those were self induced. It doesn't matter if 100 people post here and say "I have a Spanish built motor with 50k miles on it and has been tuned since birth with no problems". That doesn't change the data.
And I had a major tuner on here say just as much... early tune was messing up engines during colder months, so he went with a summer/winter tune (created winter tune, he did not say if he adjusted the summer tune).Saying that all Spanish engines are more prone to failure than all Cleveland engines is not an accurate statement. The engine failures were early 2014 builds (July-Sept?) and mostly all tuned so perhaps the tuners adjusted the tunes over time as well as manufacturing abnormalities regarding the rod bolt torque were corrected. There are many more tuned 2015 running just fine than blown engines and the frequency of engine failure has diminished over time. To my knowledge the 678, 677, 676. and 675 Spanish engines have held up better than the previous engine numbers and are the fastest EB's setting records at the track. Also, some tuners have never had a blown engine. There are too many variables that are unknown and may have changed at some point to say that Cleveland engines are superior to all Spanish engines.