Sponsored

LMR 2018 Mustang GT Auto PP1 Dyno numbers (VIDEO W/CHART!!)

Dub347sbf

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2013
Threads
6
Messages
360
Reaction score
75
Location
Amarillo TX
Vehicle(s)
2013 F150 4x4 Lariat 3.5 Ecoboost
I saw this while browsing twitter. Looks like a PP1 10 speed auto put down 415HP and 397 lb ft on a dyno!

From YouTube:

LMR.com is honored to provide the world with the FIRST dyno numbers of a 2018 GT with the new 10 speed automatic transmission!

This car does have the level 1 performance package and is rated at 460HP and 420LB/TQ at the fly wheel.

Stock Dyno Pull: 415HP/397TQ at SAE
- 93 Octane
- 10 Speed Automatic (7th Gear Pull at 1:1)
- 19" Rear Wheel w/ 275/40/19 Michelin Pilot Sports
- TOTALLY Stock Car

*Note*
The car's VSS did limit us on our pull. This is why you see car tap out at 6600 RPMs. The redline for the 2018 Mustang GT is 7500. On that note, the car does have room on the table for potentially more power!

Twitter handle @latemodelresto
DNZQBBbWAAIciEY.jpg


Edit: Thanks Ziad!
Hey guys, this is Ziad from LMR.com. Just wanted to jump in and include that the numbers are SAE corrected.
Adding video and some LULZ
[ame]

DNZlMh8V4AAzgC1.jpg


Sponsored

 
Last edited:

UAmach1

Bullitt Hopefull
Joined
Oct 10, 2017
Threads
58
Messages
1,757
Reaction score
546
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
Ford/INFINITI
Well 460-15% for a manual is like 390. So either under rated or the auto has less than 15% loss.

Is this really pushing 490-500 crank?
 

NoVaGT

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Sep 29, 2016
Threads
115
Messages
5,682
Reaction score
4,411
Location
Northern Virginia
Vehicle(s)
2019 PP1 GT Kona
Well 460-15% for a manual is like 390. So either under rated or the auto has less than 15% loss.

Is this really pushing 490-500 crank?
I didn't realize the loss percentage was that high. I thought it was around 10%.
 

LindsayEOD

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2014
Threads
7
Messages
433
Reaction score
105
Location
Wichita Falls
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT Premium
Does anyone know or remember what the 15-17's were dyno'ing at?
 

Sponsored

UAmach1

Bullitt Hopefull
Joined
Oct 10, 2017
Threads
58
Messages
1,757
Reaction score
546
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
Ford/INFINITI
I didn't realize the loss percentage was that high. I thought it was around 10%.
Unless it's changed over time manuals have usually been like 13-15% range and auto's about 20. I wouldn't be amazed if they have improved some.
 

EFI

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 19, 2015
Threads
62
Messages
4,818
Reaction score
4,132
Location
Masshole central
Vehicle(s)
5.Br0
Curious to know if the correction factor was STD or SAE and what the temps were in the building at the time.

Seems a bit high for the official Ford rating, but I imagine they are underrating the engine quite a bit. Slightly more displacement, better flowing heads and a full point of compression should be worth more than the 25hp increase Ford has rated the engine over the Gen 2.

My guess is that it's pushing some 470 fwhp and the transmission is more efficient and only losing 12%.
 

1320'

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Threads
19
Messages
3,758
Reaction score
1,616
Location
Medford,Oregon
Vehicle(s)
2011 Avenger...sadly
Unless it's changed over time manuals have usually been like 13-15% range and auto's about 20. I wouldn't be amazed if they have improved some.
No way.

Auto's have been losing closer to 10-12% for over a decade now.
 

UAmach1

Bullitt Hopefull
Joined
Oct 10, 2017
Threads
58
Messages
1,757
Reaction score
546
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
Ford/INFINITI
New cars are probably around 12%. People like you say 15% or more just to make it seems like the motor makes alot more power. We'll know true power #'s once we see trap speeds.
No, I say 15 because on average thats what some out to the proper crank numbers.

The Mach1 was rated 310hp and they on average dyno about 265, that's pretty close to 15%. If you look at most dynos, to gather an estimate crank number they all still multiply by 1.15. 15% is the standard still for estimates.

Even if it was 12% losss for a manual, that means the Auto would have to be just 10% for it to make that power at the wheels assuming that its really a 460HP engine. Somehow Ford has made the most efficient auto I've ever heard of, or its under rated.
 

MaskedRacerX

Driver
Joined
Sep 20, 2015
Threads
73
Messages
5,678
Reaction score
4,747
Location
Vilano Beach, FL
First Name
DT
Vehicle(s)
'21_JWS4XE / '21_TM3P
That's extremely stout, under-rated and/or a SUPER efficient tranny ...

% loss and resulting (calculated) FWHP:

10% loss = ~460
15% loss = ~488
20% loss = ~518
 

Sponsored

UAmach1

Bullitt Hopefull
Joined
Oct 10, 2017
Threads
58
Messages
1,757
Reaction score
546
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
Ford/INFINITI
No way.

Auto's have been losing closer to 10-12% for over a decade now.
Since when? Even in 2012 5.0 comparisons I see people with 10-15whp more on manual vs auto. I've seen valid arguments for Manual doing 12.2257, but I've yet to see many or any dynos of an auto putting down the same or more than a manual.
 

HISSMAN

Large Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2016
Threads
39
Messages
2,992
Reaction score
1,460
Location
West Virginia
Vehicle(s)
2016 Oxford White GT/PP Premium
HP peaking at 6,600 is interesting. I thought this one was supposed to make power beyond 7K? I'm going on on a limb and saying those are uncorrected numbers during a 40° day..LOL
 

UAmach1

Bullitt Hopefull
Joined
Oct 10, 2017
Threads
58
Messages
1,757
Reaction score
546
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
Ford/INFINITI
That's extremely stout, under-rated and/or a SUPER efficient tranny ...

% loss and resulting (calculated) FWHP:

10% loss = ~460
15% loss = ~488
20% loss = ~518
I'm thinking it's a combination of both. I wouldn't be amazed if its something like 475-80 with a 13-14% loss. I'm expecting to see a manual do about 420 wheel. The gap is really closing between the two.
 
OP
OP
Dub347sbf

Dub347sbf

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2013
Threads
6
Messages
360
Reaction score
75
Location
Amarillo TX
Vehicle(s)
2013 F150 4x4 Lariat 3.5 Ecoboost
HP peaking at 6,600 is interesting. I thought this one was supposed to make power beyond 7K? I'm going on on a limb and saying those are uncorrected numbers during a 40° day..LOL
Looking at 2015 Dyno sheets, looks like it is still a shift up by a couple hundred RPMs. I sent a tweet to LMR for some clarification on the temp and if they are corrected numbers, I'll update the post if they reply.
 
Last edited:
 




Top