SPRING RATES & DROPS: ALL IN ONE THREAD!!

OP
OP
Gibbo205

Gibbo205

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2015
Threads
156
Messages
6,673
Reaction score
2,207
Location
UK
Vehicle(s)
UK 2015 Mustang & BMW E46 M3
All updated, should be correct now. :)
 

Less Weight

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Threads
26
Messages
412
Reaction score
131
Location
East Coast
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Wow, this thread is a bit of a lesson in springs. So let me see if I get this right. Generally, rear springs are anywhere from 3 to 4 times stiffer than front springs?! This comes as a surprise to me as I always thought that front springs were much more stiff than rear springs as they had to support the oscilating mass of the engine. Can someone explain the significant disparity between the front and rear rates?
 

RockStang

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 15, 2015
Threads
123
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
214
Location
AA county MD
First Name
Joe
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT Whippled
Thanks OP for the post. I'm a suspension noob so this an eye opener and learning opportunity for me.

:cheers:
 

Sinub

Active Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2016
Threads
0
Messages
33
Reaction score
4
Location
Ca
Vehicle(s)
Mustang
Wow, this thread is a bit of a lesson in springs. So let me see if I get this right. Generally, rear springs are anywhere from 3 to 4 times stiffer than front springs?! This comes as a surprise to me as I always thought that front springs were much more stiff than rear springs as they had to support the oscilating mass of the engine. Can someone explain the significant disparity between the front and rear rates?
I too would like to know. Only thing I can think of is maybe the manufacturers of these springs kept drag racing in mind and general racing in mind. As you accelerate all your weight transfers to the rear causing more weight in the rear than the front during acceleration. Although that alone isn't enough to explain it.
 

Todd15Fastback

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Threads
80
Messages
10,527
Reaction score
3,875
Location
Atlanta, GA
First Name
Todd
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP Fastback
You guys are likely thinking of stick axle cars and those spring rates being somewhat close to the front spring rates.

IRS equipped cars, totally different story, hence the substantial difference in rates front to rear.
 

Sinub

Active Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2016
Threads
0
Messages
33
Reaction score
4
Location
Ca
Vehicle(s)
Mustang
You guys are likely thinking of stick axle cars and those spring rates being somewhat close to the front spring rates.

IRS equipped cars, totally different story, hence the substantial difference in rates front to rear.
Please explain in detail rather than simply say its IRS rather than DRS.
 

Glex25

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2015
Threads
9
Messages
255
Reaction score
91
Location
North Jersey
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT PP
All my cars have been IRS and the difference between front/rear has been around 2k. The front being stronger for engine support

It does seem weird that the front is softer than the back
 
Last edited:

Less Weight

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Threads
26
Messages
412
Reaction score
131
Location
East Coast
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Well, it nice to know that I'm not the only one who is perplexed regarding spring rates. Maybe one of the after market spring representitives on this forum can explain it it us. Perhaps the gentleman from Steeda may know.
 

BMR Tech

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Threads
168
Messages
5,141
Reaction score
3,691
Location
Tampa, FL
Website
www.bmrsuspension.com
First Name
Dion
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT, 2010 GT500, 2019 F-150 5.0
I'm at a race in Georgia right now, but will be happy to hop on here and share some rate info soon.

I won't quite share how we came to the rates we offer....but can address the questions about why the rates are so different etc.
 

MtnBiker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
414
Reaction score
140
Location
San Antonio, TX
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP
Can someone explain the significant disparity between the front and rear rates?
If you look at the rear suspension you'll notice the spring is pretty far inboard ... The control arm will have more leverage to compress the spring. Need higher spring rate.
 

Sinub

Active Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2016
Threads
0
Messages
33
Reaction score
4
Location
Ca
Vehicle(s)
Mustang
If you look at the rear suspension you'll notice the spring is pretty far inboard ... The control arm will have more leverage to compress the spring. Need higher spring rate.
That actually makes sense.
 

Noize

Ricer
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Threads
1
Messages
43
Reaction score
13
Location
Nashville
Vehicle(s)
2013 Evolution X
Wow, this thread is a bit of a lesson in springs. So let me see if I get this right. Generally, rear springs are anywhere from 3 to 4 times stiffer than front springs?! This comes as a surprise to me as I always thought that front springs were much more stiff than rear springs as they had to support the oscilating mass of the engine. Can someone explain the significant disparity between the front and rear rates?
Yeah this is really weird to me, particularly since a greater percentage of weight is on the front wheels. Granted I haven't had RWD cars in years, and never lowered one.

It has nothing to do with independent rear suspension. My car is IRS too, but AWD. Stock, my rates are almost identical to each other. On the current coilovers, rates are 10k/10.2k (560/571).

If you look at the rear suspension you'll notice the spring is pretty far inboard ... The control arm will have more leverage to compress the spring. Need higher spring rate.
This has to be why.
 

Simmons-Racing

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Threads
24
Messages
432
Reaction score
124
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT
Yeah this is really weird to me, particularly since a greater percentage of weight is on the front wheels. Granted I haven't had RWD cars in years, and never lowered one.

It has nothing to do with independent rear suspension. My car is IRS too, but AWD. Stock, my rates are almost identical to each other. On the current coilovers, rates are 10k/10.2k (560/571).



This has to be why.
The Motion ratio on the S550 is pretty bad compared to other cars. This is why you need so much more rear spring compared to the front.

For example,....I am going to be running 1,600-1,800lb rear springs and 650-750lb front spring for AutoX.

Simmons
 

GTP

Deutsche Pony
Joined
May 27, 2015
Threads
197
Messages
4,428
Reaction score
2,288
Location
Indy
Website
www.BambergAudio.com
First Name
Philip
Vehicle(s)
2019 GT PP1 A10 Outrageous Orange HPDE mods
Wow, this thread is a bit of a lesson in springs. So let me see if I get this right. Generally, rear springs are anywhere from 3 to 4 times stiffer than front springs?! This comes as a surprise to me as I always thought that front springs were much more stiff than rear springs as they had to support the oscilating mass of the engine. Can someone explain the significant disparity between the front and rear rates?
It is what [MENTION=16770]MtnBiker[/MENTION] said - leverage.

A coilover with the spring around the shock (and located on the LCA but much closer to the wheel) would have a spring rate closer to that used at the front.
 
 
Top