Simon
Well-Known Member
I agree with you 100%. There is no real need for that, but had it not been so costly to make CF chassis (which in future will be a common use I think), GT350 would have no contender, especially in 60k range, but it would be knocking on 911 Turbo's door. Chevy so far has got nothing on the GT350, like you said, their structure is too heavy, and so is price. Sometimes I wonder where Chevy got the MSRP for the Z/28, because surely not from real world calculations. With the mark ups, it can easily get to 80k range (like some 2015's on the dealer websites), and for that you can get a one/two year old GT-R, or a 911 or this http://www.ebay.com/itm/Jaguar-Othe...tr=true&hash=item2a552260e7&item=181816942823 . And after all it's still a mid 20k Chevy Camaro, only with some improvements.That is true but, I'd like to see the GT350 remain a $50,000 car. When compared to the z28, it's a Track Car Checkmate. It has the Camaro at every turn.
Not only that, regardless of weight, it puts the Camaro in a unique position this generation on day one. It has a basement MSRP, is a strong underdog in a GT-R/GT3/C6 Z06 fight and threatens the C7 Z51 and 997 as is.
Chevy doesn't have the engine and can't keep the MSRP low enough. An optioned 1SS isn't going to be faster than a Z51 and it risk costing just as much. The LT4 will have a peaky powerband and the driver will be shifting his heart out. Not mentioning the weight again... and obvious HEAT issues especially due to poor airflow and no more room for an additional heat exchanger in the front... Not without eliminating AC altogether.
The LT4 and matching TR6060 is a $12,000 dollar premium. Your already close to current ZL1 prices. With the equipment it needs, it would need to start around R prices at a minimum... but could be close to 4000lbs.
Sponsored