mustang_guy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2015
- Threads
- 12
- Messages
- 5,721
- Reaction score
- 1,324
- Location
- United States
- Vehicle(s)
- it has an engine!
i dont like people losing freedoms either but having restrictions in the automotive industry is not needed. Having one pertaining to meat and dairy is needed if we like our planet. That im okay with. My whole point was that direct injection is the worst thing to happen to the automotive industry. It is crap and we wouldn't have it being forced on us if the Epa actually did it job and addressed what the over abundance of live stock is doing to us. I find it relevant. If people want to focus only on the topic of meat and dairy, thats their deal. :shrug:To be clear, I'm saying that I would prefer if people would stop asking for laws that restrict my freedoms. I would really like more freedom reinstated with many laws and regulations removed from the books.
I'm not going to say what I think about the theory that human activities are affecting the climate or will at some future date. It's really off topic for this forum.
I dont think it would be that hard. The epa doesnt want to hurt its bread and butter maker which is agriculture. It choses to pretend its a lie and put out articles saying its automotive. They only care about their money, not actually helping anything that actually needs attention. The epa is a joke.Asking people to change their diets as a whole will be pretty much impossible. You have things to consider such as poverty, but curbing emissions as a whole is easier to address. Just how it is. I know were getting closer to engineered meat that will be grown in a lab and that should be able address what you're talking about. I think we'll see it within in the next 10 years.
Sponsored