Tuned EB vs Scat Pack Challenger

lizardrko · Jun 9, 2017

Thinking about upgrading to a scat pack in a couple years. I haven't driven a scat pack before so I am unfamiliar with ther power band. How is the torque down low compared to a tuned EB? Obviously mid-high RPM the scat pack will destroy it. I drove a PP GT and was really disappointed on how slow it was down low compared to my EB.

bluebeastsrt · Jun 9, 2017

What exactly do you run in the 1/4 or the 1/8 and what is your trap speed that you are disappointed with a 3.73 geared GT?

scrubber3 · Jun 9, 2017

If I were you, I'd keep the Eco-stang. You'd hate to lose all that instant torque.

WhiteyDog · Jun 9, 2017

scrubber3 said:
If I were you, I'd keep the Eco-stang. You'd hate to lose all that instant torque.
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

5pointOh · Jun 9, 2017

The scat pack is going to destroy your EB all over the RPM range.....A GT PP and a Scat Pack are a drivers race with the slight edge going to the Scat Pack. The Scat Pack with the A8 is a rocket ship off the line for how heavy it is.....

CGADAMS · Jun 9, 2017

Honestly a tune, cai, and catback wakes up the coyote quite a bit like a tune does for the ecoboost. saying that I have yet to lose to a scat-pack, hell even had a fender on a V wagon up to 100. that being said the only L so far ive had was to a 700hp cummins -_- but im not afraid to say when I lose lol

slag1911 · Jun 9, 2017

lizardrko said:
Thinking about upgrading to a scat pack in a couple years. I haven't driven a scat pack before so I am unfamiliar with ther power band. How is the torque down low compared to a tuned EB? Obviously mid-high RPM the scat pack will destroy it. I drove a PP GT and was really disappointed on how slow it was down low compared to my EB.

your ecoboost will walk a scatpack in a "part throttle" race... :lol:

Elgyn · Jun 9, 2017

slag1911 said:
your ecoboost will walk a scatpack in a "part throttle" race... :lol:

I think there's an episode of Pinks in there somewhere....:headbonk:

hossman · Jun 9, 2017

Scat Pack will destroy the EB and depending on the driver will take down a stock GT almost every time. As heavy as it is you do realize it puts out 485hp and 475tq?

jcart953 · Jun 10, 2017

[ame="[MEDIA=youtube]Lx3ruqNjL5w[/MEDIA]"]

[ame="[MEDIA=youtube]yh8ooRKKEzk[/MEDIA]"]

Smarz1018 · Jun 12, 2017

^^^ love my ecoboost

bluebeastsrt · Jun 12, 2017

jcart953 said:

Did you really post a 13.2 scat pack as an example ??? You eb guys are some doopy f----.

1320' · Jun 12, 2017

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRn_ENI466FFx--s8iACDXsTjuuezDTqxuR_LGrn6ZSKI1sBiS_.jpg

CGADAMS said:
Honestly a tune, cai, and catback wakes up the coyote quite a bit like a tune does for the ecoboost. saying that I have yet to lose to a scat-pack, hell even had a fender on a V wagon up to 100. that being said the only L so far ive had was to a 700hp cummins -_- but im not afraid to say when I lose lol

moto111 · Jun 12, 2017

haha if a gt pp felt slower then your eco you sir cant drive

Spykexx · Jun 12, 2017

bluebeastsrt said:
Did you really post a 13.2 scat pack as an example ??? You eb guys are some doopy f----.

And? Many tuners have already pushed the EB far past the 12.6 stock times for the scat pack. And yes, that's stock motor/turbo on a 93 tune since I know you'll have some d***head response like always. Adam hit 11.6 on stock motor/turbo/93 without weight reduction. Even bama's garbage tune is in the 12's. The EB guys are bad? Sure many will try to justify their purchase, but very rarely are they even close to as douche-y as some of the GT owners on here.

*Note: The title does state "Tuned EB"*

Tuned EB vs Scat Pack Challenger

lizardrko

Well-Known Member

bluebeastsrt

Oh boy

scrubber3

Hopper, is that you?

WhiteyDog

WOOF!!!

5pointOh

Well-Known Member

CGADAMS

Well-Known Member

slag1911

Well-Known Member

Elgyn

Well-Known Member

hossman

Well-Known Member

jcart953

Well-Known Member

Smarz1018

ScubaSteve

bluebeastsrt

Oh boy

1320'

Well-Known Member

moto111

Well-Known Member

Spykexx

Well-Known Member