Sponsored

Have you blown an engine? If so, what rod (cylinder) failed?

What rod (cylinder) failed on your engine?


  • Total voters
    44

LuckyJerk

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2016
Threads
7
Messages
81
Reaction score
18
Location
NY
First Name
Michael
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost Mustang AT
Good job on the list Maggneto!
Going through that list I didn't see blown motor caused from a FP tune.
Glad I went that way with my tune!
 
OP
OP
Juben

Juben

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Threads
35
Messages
2,519
Reaction score
807
Location
Chattanooga, TN
First Name
Justin
Vehicle(s)
2015 EcoBoost Mustang (AT) w/PP
A blown motor, on the FP tune, was just posted on FB with pics. It had the tune and an intercooler and was just installed two days prior to popping. It took out Cylinder #2 and had a code for a Cyl. 2 misfire. What's interesting is that it bent the rod and it didn't snap. This now makes (2) cases that I've seen with bent rods. That can sometimes save the block but his cracked the piston and did a good bit of damage to it, so the entire motor is being replaced by Ford under warranty.
 

LuckyJerk

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2016
Threads
7
Messages
81
Reaction score
18
Location
NY
First Name
Michael
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost Mustang AT
A blown motor, on the FP tune, was just posted on FB with pics. It had the tune and an intercooler and was just installed two days prior to popping. It took out Cylinder #2 and had a code for a Cyl. 2 misfire. What's interesting is that it bent the rod and it didn't snap. This now makes (2) cases that I've seen with bent rods. That can sometimes save the block but his cracked the piston and did a good bit of damage to it, so the entire motor is being replaced by Ford under warranty.
Ahhh was not aware of that.
Did they happen to say if their was a different tune prior to this one or was it always stock before the tune?
 

Sponsored

Spykexx

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2016
Threads
30
Messages
876
Reaction score
309
Location
Quad Cities, IA
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang GT Prem M6, 2019 Charger Scat Pack Plus
I agree [MENTION=23892]CustomS550[/MENTION]. As soon as I got rid of my AGS my temps definitely leveled out oil wise. I used to ride about 75% through the green when warm. Now I hover at maybe 35-45%.
 
OP
OP
Juben

Juben

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Threads
35
Messages
2,519
Reaction score
807
Location
Chattanooga, TN
First Name
Justin
Vehicle(s)
2015 EcoBoost Mustang (AT) w/PP
Ahhh was not aware of that.
Did they happen to say if their was a different tune prior to this one or was it always stock before the tune?
He talks like this was the only tune that's been installed along with the intercooler. He said it was on the car for a couple of days before it crapped out. Fortunately though, Ford is warranting it, so there is a way to have your cake and eat it too. Lol
 

Brianh922

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Threads
15
Messages
254
Reaction score
42
Location
Midlothian, VA
First Name
Brian
Vehicle(s)
18 Mustang GT PP1
Yup blew mine up on Super bowl Sunday earlier this year. 12/14 Build date. 23k miles. Running Motul Xcess 8100. E85 on a Full Race 7163 Turbo Kit. Stopped on the way to a super bowl party to make a hit and as soon as it shifted to 2nd boom #3 rod snapped.
 

Maggneto

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2016
Threads
14
Messages
914
Reaction score
390
Location
York County, South Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2015 Turbo Premium PP/Navi/ZF(6R80) Shaker Pro
I have yet to see a rod let go on #4, and #1 appears to be cracked pistons. It is probably safe to say that is not random and that there is something about #2 and especially #3 that is contributing to these failures.

Since there should not be any difference between #4 rod/piston and #3 rod/piston material, manufacturing, or defect, it appears highly unlikely that a defect, manufacturing, or material would never occur on #4.

It may be that #2/#3 are more prone to LSPI like events under certain conditions, and/or the weakest link because of the design (balance shaft gear).
 

perfweld

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2016
Threads
12
Messages
484
Reaction score
214
Location
Northern CA
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost Mustang
I have yet to see a rod let go on #4, and #1 appears to be cracked pistons. It is probably safe to say that is not random and that there is something about #2 and especially #3 that is contributing to these failures.

Since there should not be any difference between #4 rod/piston and #3 rod/piston material, manufacturing, or defect, it appears highly unlikely that a defect, manufacturing, or material would never occur on #4.

It may be that #2/#3 are more prone to LSPI like events under certain conditions, and/or the weakest link because of the design (balance shaft gear).
#1 and #2 show the most knock count, #3 trails those cylinders slightly, and #4 never does get any knock count. Could be that fuel is fed starting at the rear cylinder. The center cylinders will get the most heat as there siamese to the rear and front cylinders, where as #1 and #4 should have better cooling with more water around the cylinder. I would assume that the two cylinders that would have issues would be #2 and #3. It all has to do with knock count, the cylinder that knocks the most is the one that's gonna have a problem, hence why #4 never has any issues. This is just my observation on my own car, other cars could be different. Always over octane people, and dont ask your tuner for to much low engine speed TQ.
 

Sponsored

MakStang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Threads
15
Messages
1,678
Reaction score
265
Location
Greece
Website
www.cellentis.uk
First Name
Makis
Vehicle(s)
A 2017 miraculous little beast
I would also be interested to find out if there are any European or Australian Mustangs that have blown an engine.
 

Edkiefer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2015
Threads
0
Messages
324
Reaction score
38
Location
NYC
Vehicle(s)
XR4ti
#1 and #2 show the most knock count, #3 trails those cylinders slightly, and #4 never does get any knock count. Could be that fuel is fed starting at the rear cylinder. The center cylinders will get the most heat as there siamese to the rear and front cylinders, where as #1 and #4 should have better cooling with more water around the cylinder. I would assume that the two cylinders that would have issues would be #2 and #3. It all has to do with knock count, the cylinder that knocks the most is the one that's gonna have a problem, hence why #4 never has any issues. This is just my observation on my own car, other cars could be different. Always over octane people, and dont ask your tuner for to much low engine speed TQ.
I agree, I think its cooling issue, but also looking at were the knock sensors are located.
#1 between 1st and 2snd cylinders and #2 by 4th cylinder, so #3 doesn't have one right by it.
Not that you want to rely on knock sensor for timing retard as there always a delay (it has to knock first).
 

perfweld

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2016
Threads
12
Messages
484
Reaction score
214
Location
Northern CA
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ecoboost Mustang
I agree, I think its cooling issue, but also looking at were the knock sensors are located.
#1 between 1st and 2snd cylinders and #2 by 4th cylinder, so #3 doesn't have one right by it.
Not that you want to rely on knock sensor for timing retard as there always a delay (it has to knock first).

Good point on the knock sensor location !!!
 

TheLion

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2016
Threads
68
Messages
1,621
Reaction score
585
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
Ruby Red 2016 Mustang GT PP 6-MT
My theory about the low mileage seems to be holding relatively constant. I'm sure some one will pop one at 50k or 100k etc., but it does seem pretty darn common that if a rod is going to let go, it happens under roughly 36k...aka that whole infant mortality thing I keep talking about. Even that first ford performance tuned EB in the video that pop was at 17k.

Also is a good case about what I suggested in using the Ford Performance tune as an "engine break in" tune. If the rods are sound with the FP tune for the first 36k, there's a good chance they will hold up over time with similar or slightly hotter tunes. While it's not as wild as some after market tunes, my particular EB is pushing around 400 ft-lbs at the CRANK (360 wtq), so it's not anemic by any means. It's a cheap way to have some potential headache on your dime and it's good for diagnosing issues as you can always flash back to it as a baseline.

Oil cooler with any good quality GM Dexos 1 Gen 2 compatible oil + a good inter cooler with proper tuning should rule out user related failures. This is a mass produced engine, some will fail even with warrantied tunes like the FP. There's certainly been a couple hundred (out of 500,000+) ecoboost F-150's that failed completely stock engines, same with ST's, RS's and every other car. Heck there's a bunch of bone stock failed 5.0's and 6.2's and that's what the warranty is for.

I'll stick with my FP tune at least until 36k, hopefully by then if nothing has given out I can have relative confidence in the engine's integrity against factory rod or piston defects.

Has anyone sheared a crank on these? Seems that the rods are almost ALWAYS the first to go and everything else follows.

I talked to Livernois yesterday and they now have a few clients with their 93 tune on with over 100k, those are early 2015 builds so they have the Spanish built engines. I'm starting to think more of these failures might be Ford supplier issues rather than all tune related or even LSPI. F-150's had a big rash of them back in 2012-2013 where a decent number of bone stock engines let go, majority very early on (again in my searching most well under 30k).
Sponsored

 
 




Top