Be realistic. They already testing 3.5 EcoBoost in trucks and suvs for few years.Stupid thought, but what if this was the return of an inline 6?
Sponsored
Be realistic. They already testing 3.5 EcoBoost in trucks and suvs for few years.Stupid thought, but what if this was the return of an inline 6?
I pay attention to Mustang stuff, not trucks and SUV's, so I didn't know that. But notice I preferenced my comment with "Stupid thought".Be realistic. They already testing 3.5 EcoBoost in trucks and suvs for few years.
What's the concern with a missing minor exterior piece on a test vehicle? This is fairly typical.The heck is going on with the (missing) rocker panel in this prototype
So many questions.....:tsk:
Not concerned.... more like curious and wish we had more answers than questions. ;)What's the concern with a missing minor exterior piece on a test vehicle? This is fairly typical.
He did...QFTI pay attention to Mustang stuff, not trucks and SUV's, so I didn't know that. But notice I preferenced my comment with "Stupid thought".
If you viewed some of the other prototype photos, I think you've see missing exterior trim pieces, yes?Not concerned.... more like curious and wish we had more answers than questions. ;)
Yes it has and there is this:Not if it were to be a special edition, as Mitchell is suggesting in this thread. A hipo Mustang SE can step on the GT's shoes all it wants.
Plus, a 3.5L would help with the whole problem of "it costs too much to produce another one-off engine for the Mustang" since its development for the most part has been funded by the F150. I'm sure modifications would have to be made (of which I'm not sure how much) but I would think a lot of the R&D would be paid for already.
Even with better audio quality we would not know for sure but I have a feeling these are related. Time will time.Hmm some corrections,
S550 program was not always 2.3 and 5.0 and nothing else.
You are correct it started with 2 engines and no V6. Many displacements were explored. It was for some time 2.7 but that changed a few years ago and settled on 2.3 for fuel economy and performance reasons. After 3 engines was decided, 3.7 was added, then replaced with 3.5.
S550 had the 3.5 until mid 2012 when finally determined the 3.7 was the best way due to cost and other factors. I'll just say, 3.5 is still being explored.
The only way this would even be remotely possible would be if Ford wanted to salvage a few jobs in OZ and keep the Barra engine plant functional. The 4.0 was cranking out 416/417. But that's output in direct competition with the current Coyote, though maybe not the next version. Anyway, not going to happen:Stupid thought, but what if this was the return of an inline 6?
Sounds normally aspirated. FPCs fire like a staggered doubled inline four cylinder, so the comparison to fours that some are making is valid. I don't hear V6 lumpiness in it, and from the revs versus launch acceleration, it would seem to imply a peaky motor. Most of what I observe points to a FPC V8. The exhaust tune is fair, so I'm guessing that the production tune will approach a Ferrari bark when it's complete.
If you look closely, you can see there is a sensor mounted where the rocker panel normally is.
The heck is going on with the (missing) rocker panel in this prototype
So many questions.....:tsk:
Kudos for the unique thought. A straight six would be fun to have in a Mustang.Cool, thanks for the information! The unusual sound coupled with Mustang heritage and Pericak's mention of having some surprises in store kind of made me think of that.