Sponsored
OP
OP
Kzanard
Active Member
- Thread starter
- #17
Yes and no. The latest shop found that I had one seating in Flight Control set wrong and it was cutting off on the top end (I forgot which one). When they changed the setting, I gained some on the top end.
In the attached dyno, it shows:
- Run 1: 3.75 with my original settings
- Run 2: 3.75 with revised setting
- Run 3: 3.625 with revised setting
Super Werty
Well-Known Member
Well what setting was it?
pro 5.0
Well-Known Member
Sorry not trying to take away from it but those numbers make no sense. With the revised settings you gained 13.34 hp and lost 19 tq, then you dropped down .125 in pulley size which at best is 30 rwhp but yet you gained 68.57 hp and 85.05 tq ?
pro 5.0
Well-Known Member
The only setting that it could be is KNOCK LIMITING if you look at his run 1 there is a consistent dip in the hp line as the motor climbs to rpm, which would indicate the computer was pulling timing.
OP
OP
Kzanard
Active Member
- Thread starter
- #21
I am not sure if the exact setting, but Limiting might have been it.
Run 1 & 2 were done right after one another and there was surely some amount of heat soak (I don't have fans). Run 3 was done after the car had cooled a little :shrug:
i could care less about the numbers as long as the car runs smoothly, and it does. Definitely a very noticeable difference with the smaller pulley.
Just mainly posted in case anyone was curious about Mustang dyno vs Dynojet as the subject comes up a lot...
Run 1 & 2 were done right after one another and there was surely some amount of heat soak (I don't have fans). Run 3 was done after the car had cooled a little :shrug:
i could care less about the numbers as long as the car runs smoothly, and it does. Definitely a very noticeable difference with the smaller pulley.
Just mainly posted in case anyone was curious about Mustang dyno vs Dynojet as the subject comes up a lot...
Sponsored