stage3s4
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2015
- Threads
- 3
- Messages
- 130
- Reaction score
- 22
- Location
- Westchester NY
- Vehicle(s)
- 2015 Mustang GT, PP, CO
agreed to what the other poster said. In order to be competitive and not have to deal with emissions issues going supercharger was a no brainier. Force induction is really the wave of the future so I would expect to see alot more of it moving forward.I saw 2 comments on here that I wanted to respond to. First someone had mentioned that the C7 Z06 had ballooned from its 2002 variant as a balanced track car to what is essentially what the ZR1 tried to accomplish (omg horsepower) and I agree wholeheartedly.
While the "Z06" dates back to the 60s, I believe most folks in the modern era remember it as the 2001 version, but fondly remember it in its 2002 form when it got bumped to 405HP. GM did such a wonderful job in fine tuning the C5 platform, which at that time was really world class, and charged a ridiculously light price for it. They even brought back the "hardtop" body style because it was more rigid and lighter than the standard Corvettes with the hatch door. The result was a car that could run 12.4s in the quarter, going neck and neck with the grotesque Viper V10 with 500hp (8.3L by then?), .96g on the skid pad, and from 70-0 in 160ft. Back then I remember it being around 50K for an amazing sports car. This thing could punch up the ladder of performance more than a few rungs.
This takes me into the second comment I read about the complaints about the interior and creature amenities. Corvette has gotten waaaaay better since the C5, and I'll be the first to say yeah that was one ugly interior. But GM is/was making sports cars for the sports car inclined. Call it purpose built or cutting corners to keep the costs down, but that's the entire point of a Corvette. Performance is front and center, no need to pay for a bunch of junk you may use a few times then forget was there. It's one reason I picked a base GT over a Premium one; I just wanted the thrills of the V8. Does it turn away potential buyers? Yeah I'm sure it does, but my answer would be the same for those who will go on and on about how some cars should be manual only: it's not for you. Go elsewhere. The whole "redneck Ferrari" just seems like an ignorant comment (Ferraris are more than raw performance numbers) to make imo, especially on a Mustang forum.
The C7 Z06 disappointed me in a few ways it exists, most of all it being a supercharged V8 engine. More power solves most problems, but it just comes off as using a sledgehammer than a hole punch to me. Take the GT350 for example. Such a wonderful step in the right direction, but because of bricks like the Hellcats from Dodge, I've been hearing talks of yet another GT500.
The C7R uses a 5.5L race version of the LS/LT/whatever letter/number they decided to put after the L these days. I think it would have been cooler if the Z06 was equipped with that and designed as being a street sibling to that car, much how the C6 Z06 got the 7L engine based from the C6R before they had to drop the size due to regulations changing and the GT1 class going extinct.
Sponsored